Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Intimate partner aggression--what have we learned? Comment on Archer (2000)

Jacquelyn W White1, Paige Hall Smith, Mary P Koss

  • 1U North Carolina.

Psychological Bulletin
|September 16, 2000
PubMed
Summary

This meta-analysis on aggression has significant data and methodological limitations. These issues may undermine efforts to eradicate violence against women.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Examining Sexual Exploitation in a National US Sample of LGBTQ+ Individuals Using the Revised Sexual Experiences Survey-Victimization.

Journal of sex research·2025
Same author

Technology-Facilitated Sexual Exploitation Module of the SES-V: Prevalence and Differential Vulnerability Across Two U.S. National Samples.

Journal of sex research·2025
Same author

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Bar-Staff Bystander Intervention Training Program for Reducing Sexual Aggression.

Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs·2024
Same author

Healing strategies of women who experienced sexual assault: A mixed method analysis.

Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy·2024
Same author

Innovative Services for Survivors of Sexual Violence: Mapping New Pathways Forward.

Violence against women·2024
Same author

Quantifying Criminal Sexual Acts: The Illegal Sexual Exploitation Module of the Revised Sexual Experiences Survey-Victimization (SES-V) Measure.

Journal of sex research·2024

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Sociology
  • Criminology

Background:

  • Critique of J. Archer's (2000) meta-analysis on aggression.
  • Concerns regarding the conceptual framework and definitions used in aggression research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and analyze limitations in Archer's (2000) meta-analysis.
  • To evaluate the impact of methodological flaws on the study's conclusions.
  • To assess the policy implications of the meta-analysis in the context of violence against women.

Main Methods:

  • Critical review of primary data, meta-analytic procedures, and result interpretations.
  • Examination of conceptual definitions of aggression and methodological issues in included studies.
  • Assessment of measurement of contextual factors, injury outcomes, scaling, and sampling.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identified limitations in primary data, meta-analysis, and interpretation of results.
  • Highlighted conceptual issues with aggression dichotomy and definitions.
  • Noted methodological problems including inadequate measurement and sampling concerns.

Conclusions:

  • The meta-analysis's contribution to the field is questionable due to identified limitations.
  • Inadequate attention to policy implications may hinder societal efforts to eradicate violence against women.
  • Further research requires rigorous methodology and clear conceptualization to inform policy effectively.