Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience.

M D Dunn1, A J Portis, A L Shalhav

  • 1Departments of Surgery, Urology and Radiology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110, USA.

The Journal of Urology
|September 19, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy offers a viable alternative for localized renal tumors up to 10 cm, providing reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery compared to open surgery.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Population dynamics of a South African isolate of <i>Steinernema yirgalemense in vitro</i> liquid culture, using egg yolk as protein source.

Journal of helminthology·2024
Same author

The dimensions and symmetry of the seminal vesicles.

Journal of robotic surgery·2016
Same author

The impact of REACH on classification for human health hazards.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2014
Same author

Cause-specific mortality following radical prostatectomy.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2011
Same author

Laparoscopic renal surgery.

Minerva chirurgica·2009
Same author

Fifteen-year follow-up of transplantation of a cadaveric polycystic kidney: a case report.

Transplantation proceedings·2008

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Laparoscopic surgery for renal cell carcinoma is an evolving field.
  • Minimally invasive techniques aim to improve patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To report experience with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
  • To compare outcomes with a contemporary cohort undergoing open radical nephrectomy.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 61 laparoscopic radical nephrectomies (1990-1999).
  • Comparison with 33 patients who underwent open radical nephrectomy.
  • Data analyzed for blood loss, hospital stay, pain, recovery, and recurrence.

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic group showed significantly less blood loss (172 vs 451 ml), shorter hospital stay (3.4 vs 5.2 days), and quicker return to activity (3.6 vs 8.1 weeks).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Recurrence rates were similar (8% laparoscopic vs 9% open).
  • Tumor size up to 10 cm did not affect benefits; no port-site seeding observed.

    • Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is a viable option for localized renal tumors up to 10 cm.
    • It offers improved postoperative recovery with less pain and faster return to activity.
    • Similar efficacy to open surgery for T1 and T2 tumors at 2-year follow-up.