Laparoscopic surgery in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts: safety and monitoring

S V Jackman1, J D Weingart, S L Kinsman

  • 1James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, and Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

The Journal of Urology
|September 19, 2000
PubMed

Insights

Patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts undergoing laparoscopic surgery did not show increased intracranial pressure. Routine anesthetic monitoring is sufficient, avoiding risky invasive shunt monitoring.

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Anesthesiology
  • Pediatric Surgery

Background:

  • Ventriculoperitoneal shunts are used to treat hydrocephalus.
  • Concerns exist regarding increased intracranial pressure during laparoscopic procedures in patients with shunts.
  • Previous recommendations included shunt pressure monitoring and ventricular drainage.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate clinical indications of increased intracranial pressure in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts during laparoscopic surgery.
  • To assess the safety and necessity of invasive shunt monitoring during laparoscopy.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of anesthesia records for 18 patients (12 female, 6 male) with ventriculoperitoneal shunts undergoing 19 laparoscopic operations.
  • Data collected included operative time, carbon dioxide levels, vital signs, and anesthetic events.
  • Postoperative records were analyzed for neurological changes.

Main Results:

  • Mean operative time was 7 hours 13 minutes; mean laparoscopic time was 2 hours 52 minutes.
  • Average insufflation pressure was 16 mm Hg (range 12-20).
  • No evidence of increased intracranial pressure, neurological deterioration, or adverse anesthetic events was observed. Shunt revision rate was consistent with literature.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic surgery in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts does not appear to cause clinically significant increased intracranial pressure.
  • Invasive shunt monitoring methods carry risks and are not routinely indicated.
  • Standard anesthetic monitoring is adequate for these patients in the absence of contrary evidence.
Abstract