Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2026

Exploring the Effects of Spaceflight on Mouse Physiology using the Open Access NASA GeneLab Platform
Published on: January 13, 2019
Culture and error in space: implications from analog environments
1Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, 78712, USA.
National culture significantly impacts aviation and medicine team dynamics, affecting leader-follower relationships and rule adherence. Professional pride coexists with a dangerous sense of invulnerability to stress, increasing error probability in critical operations.
Area of Science:
- Cross-cultural psychology
- Human factors in aviation and medicine
- Team performance and error management
Background:
- Investigates national, organizational, and professional cultures in aviation and medicine.
- Builds upon existing research on national culture dimensions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and analyze cultural differences influencing crew operations.
- To examine the role of professional culture, including perceptions of stress and fatigue.
- To develop models for understanding and managing team error in operational environments.
Main Methods:
- Survey data collection from 26 nations across 5 continents.
- Analysis of national differences in leadership, group orientation, and rule adherence.
- Observational data from normal flight operations to develop threat and error management models.
Main Results:
- Significant national variations exist in leader-follower relationships, individualism vs. collectivism, and adherence to rules.
- Professional cultures show job enjoyment and pride, but also a misperception of personal invulnerability to stress/fatigue.
- Five categories of crew error were defined, linked to Crew Resource Management (CRM) training.
Conclusions:
- Cultural differences have operational implications for international crew functioning, particularly in space environments.
- Misperceptions of invulnerability contribute to teamwork failures and increased error rates.
- Developed models and error categories are applicable to spaceflight and other complex socio-technical domains.
Related Concept Videos
Random and Systematic Errors
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Random and Systematic Errors
Errors in Global Positioning System

