Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Preparatory attention: experiment and theory.

D LaBerge1, L Auclair, E Sieroff

  • 1Simon's Rock College of Bard, Great Barrington, Massachusetts 01230, USA.

Consciousness and Cognition
|September 20, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acquired spatial dyslexia.

Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine·2015
Same author

Attention and the measurement of perceptual learning.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Contextual control of letter perception.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Thalamic and cortical mechanisms of attention suggested by recent positron emission tomographic experiments.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

"Where is the sun" for hemi-neglect patients?

Brain and cognition·2009
Same author

[Unilateral spatial neglect: 30 years of research, discoveries, hope, and (especially) questions].

Revue neurologique·2008

This study shows that attention preparation impacts reaction times. Weak attention leads to slower responses when distractors are frequent, while strong attention maintains fast responses.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Experimental Psychology

Background:

  • Spatial attention is crucial for information processing.
  • Understanding attentional preparation is key to explaining cognitive performance.
  • Existing theories of attention (activity-based, criterion-based) offer different explanations for preparatory effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of preparatory attention in spatial tasks.
  • To examine how varying distractor frequency affects performance under different attentional states.
  • To compare the explanatory power of early and late attention theories.

Main Methods:

  • A novel spatial preparation task was developed.
  • Participants responded to a central target while ignoring peripheral distractors.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Distractor frequency and attentional instructions were manipulated across experiments.
  • Response times were measured under varying conditions of preparatory attention.

    • Main Results:

    • Weak preparatory attention resulted in significantly slower response times with increased distractor frequency.
    • Strong preparatory attention, induced by instructions and display saliency, led to stable response times regardless of distractor frequency.
    • In the absence of distractors, increasing target trial frequency decreased response times.

    Conclusions:

    • The level of preparatory attention significantly modulates performance in spatial tasks.
    • Findings support early, activity-based theories of attention over late, criterion-based theories.
    • A cognitive neuroscience framework can further elucidate the mechanisms of attentional preparation.