Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hypothesis testing and anomaly explaining.

P van Andel1

  • 1Academisch Ziekenhuis Groningen, The Netherlands.

Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
|September 20, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

One day of serendipity and 10 years of work: the birth of the stethoscope.

Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology·2001
Same author

A comparison of the effect of narrow-band ultraviolet B in the treatment of psoriasis after salt-water baths and after 8-methoxypsoralen baths.

The British journal of dermatology·2001
Same author

'Animal electricity'.

Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology·2001
Same author

Semmelweis and puerperal fever.

Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology·2001
Same author

A history-making approach.

Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology·2000
Same author

Obstetric and gynecologic milestones.

Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology·2000
Same journal

Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of an Assamese version of the female infertility stigma instrument (ISI-F) among medically assisted reproduction (MAR) treatment seeking women in Assam, India.

Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Fathers in the shadow of pregnancy: a qualitative study on couvade syndrome in expectant fathers.

Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Correction.

Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Psychological hardiness and coping behaviour implementation in Japanese menopausal women: a cross-sectional survey of stress, coping strategies, and their translation into behaviour.

Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Recent advances in the relationship between mental symptoms in postmenopausal women and estrogen fluctuations.

Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Exploring the role of social media and online communities in the infertility journey: a scoping review.

Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology·2026
See all related articles

Scientific investigation involves two key processes: rigorously testing hypotheses and explaining unexpected anomalies. Researchers first check for errors, then develop and test new hypotheses to understand surprising results, advancing scientific knowledge.

Area of Science:

  • Scientific methodology
  • Epistemology
  • Research process

Background:

  • Scientific inquiry often encounters anomalies that contradict existing knowledge.
  • Initial reactions to anomalies typically involve suspecting experimental error.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the dual process of hypothesis testing and anomaly explanation in scientific investigation.
  • To highlight the complementary roles of deductive and inductive reasoning in research.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of the scientific method.
  • Examination of researcher responses to anomalous findings.
  • Illustrative examples of scientific discovery driven by anomalies.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Scientific investigation proceeds on two parallel tracks: hypothesis testing and anomaly explanation.
  • Ad hoc interpretations of anomalies can lead to new, independently testable hypotheses.
  • The interplay between testing and explaining drives scientific progress.

    • Conclusions:

    • A robust scientific process requires both the verification of established theories and the exploration of unexplained phenomena.
    • Embracing and investigating anomalies is crucial for scientific advancement and paradigm shifts.
    • The described two-legged approach ensures comprehensive and dynamic scientific exploration.