Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laposcopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: evolution of a new technique.

G Janetschek1

  • 1Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. gjanetschek@hotmail.com

World Journal of Urology
|September 23, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection offers a less invasive surgical option for detecting cancer spread and removing residual tumors. This approach demonstrates lower morbidity and high patient satisfaction without compromising long-term oncologic outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

28-Year Survival following Several Metastasectomies, Going through 8th Line Systemic Therapy in a Case of mRCC.

Case reports in urology·2015
Same author

Laparoscopic adenomectomy versus Eraser laser enucleation of the prostate.

World journal of urology·2015
Same author

Tissue effects resulting from eraser laser enucleation of the prostate: in vivo investigation.

Urologia internationalis·2013
Same author

The use of mannitol in partial and live donor nephrectomy: an international survey.

World journal of urology·2012
Same author

[Partial nephrectomy - pro laparoscopy].

Der Urologe. Ausg. A·2012
Same author

[Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy - pro laparoscopy].

Der Urologe. Ausg. A·2012

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is crucial for staging and treating retroperitoneal malignancies.
  • Open RPLND carries significant morbidity.
  • Laparoscopic techniques are increasingly explored to mitigate surgical risks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of laparoscopic RPLND for staging and residual tumor resection.
  • To compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus open RPLND.
  • To assess patient satisfaction and oncologic outcomes following laparoscopic RPLND.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic RPLND for staging or residual disease.
  • Comparison of operative time, complication rates, and hospital stay with historical open surgery data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of oncologic outcomes including recurrence and survival rates.
  • Patient-reported satisfaction surveys.

    • Main Results:

    • Laparoscopic RPLND achieved operative times comparable to open surgery after an initial learning curve.
    • Morbidity and complication rates were significantly lower in the laparoscopic group from the outset.
    • No compromise in oncologic long-term outcomes was observed with the laparoscopic approach.
    • Patient satisfaction levels were reported as very high.

    Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic RPLND is a safe and effective alternative to open surgery for indicated retroperitoneal procedures.
    • The technique offers reduced morbidity and high patient satisfaction while maintaining oncologic efficacy.
    • Laparoscopic RPLND is a viable option for improving patient recovery in retroperitoneal cancer management.