Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

P G Schulam1, R E Link

  • 1Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, 6560 Fannin, Suite 2100, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

World Journal of Urology
|September 23, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experience with 750 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies--is it time to use a standardized classification of complications?

The Journal of urology·2010
Same author

Positive margins in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 855 cases: a multi-institutional survey from the United States and Europe.

The Journal of urology·2007
Same author

Complications of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and their management: the UCLA experience.

Urology·2007
Same author

Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

Current urology reports·2002
Same author

Complications of laparoscopic procedures after concentrated training in urological laparoscopy.

The Journal of urology·2001
Same author

Indications for pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer.

The Urologic clinics of North America·2001
Same journal

Safety and efficacy of different surgical approaches in single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on propensity score matching analysis.

World journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Intrarenal pressure and clinical outcomes during suction-assisted versus conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

World journal of urology·2026
Same journal

AI-driven model for early failure prediction after HIFU integrating immediate post-ablation ultrasound and clinical data.

World journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Comment on "Nurse-led postoperative telemonitoring program following outpatient urethroplasty: a pilot study".

World journal of urology·2026
Same journal

What should the urologist know on the management of kidney cancer in patients with Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome? Recommendations of the European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group.

World journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Modified HoLEP technique: does it preserve ejaculation?

World journal of urology·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy (LRRP) shows promise for organ-confined prostate cancer. Further research is needed to compare its benefits against traditional open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Organ-confined prostate carcinoma treatment is evolving.
  • Laparoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy (LRRP) emerged in 1997.
  • Over 150 LRRP cases are documented in literature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of LRRP.
  • To consider LRRP as a treatment option.
  • To compare LRRP with open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of reported LRRP cases.
  • Analysis of technical advantages, morbidity, and functional outcomes.

Main Results:

  • LRRP is a feasible and efficacious procedure.
  • Open RRP is a standard treatment with excellent outcomes and low morbidity.

Related Experiment Videos

Conclusions:

  • LRRP is a viable option for prostate cancer.
  • Direct comparison with open RRP is necessary to determine definitive benefits.
  • Long-term functional outcomes and morbidity require systematic evaluation.