Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Efficiency of case-control studies with multiple controls per case: continuous or dichotomous data.

H K Ury

    Biometrics
    |September 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study compares case-control study designs. Matching one case with k controls is more statistically efficient than standard matched-pairs, especially with continuous data.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A simple approximation for calculating sample sizes for comparing independent proportions.

    Biometrics·2015
    Same author

    Another shortcut method for calculating the confidence interval of a Poisson variable (or of a standardized mortality ratio)

    American journal of epidemiology·1985
    Same author

    Investigation of a cluster of anencephaly and spina bifida.

    American journal of epidemiology·1984
    Same author

    Screening for possible drug carcinogenicity: second report of findings.

    Journal of the National Cancer Institute·1983
    Same author

    Psychological questionnaire score, cigarette smoking, and myocardial infarction: a continuing enigma.

    Preventive medicine·1983
    Same author

    Breast cancer and serum cholesterol.

    Journal of the National Cancer Institute·1982

    Area of Science:

    • Epidemiology
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Case-control studies are fundamental in epidemiological research.
    • Standard matched-pairs designs are commonly used but may not be optimal.
    • Investigating the efficiency of designs with multiple controls per case is crucial.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To statistically compare the efficiency of matching one case with k controls versus standard matched-pairs designs.
    • To evaluate efficiency for both continuous and dichotomous outcome variables.
    • To provide a general formula for comparing designs with different numbers of controls.

    Main Methods:

    • Statistical efficiency comparison using variance ratio for continuous data.
    • Pitman efficiency calculation for dichotomous data, comparing Miettinen's/Pike and Morrow's tests against McNemar's test.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Derivation of efficiency ratios for varying numbers of controls (k).

    • Main Results:

    • The efficiency of matching one case with k controls relative to one control is 2k/(k+1) for continuous data with equal variances.
    • A general formula, k1(k2+1)/k2(k1+1), quantifies efficiency when comparing k1 controls to k2 controls.
    • Pitman efficiency for dichotomous data aligns with continuous data results under equal variances.

    Conclusions:

    • Matching cases with multiple controls (k > 1) enhances statistical efficiency in case-control studies.
    • The derived formulas provide a quantitative basis for optimizing study design.
    • Findings support the use of designs with multiple controls for increased power and precision.