Evaluation of an experimental milking pulsation system for effects on milking and udder health

D J Wilson1, R N Gonzalez, L H Southwick

  • 1Quality Milk Promotion Services, Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA. djwll@cornell.edu

Journal of Dairy Science
|September 26, 2000
PubMed

This study was to test whether cows milked by an experimental pulsation method differed from cows milked with conventional pulsation milking in somatic cell count (SCC), intramammary infections (IMI) defined by milk bacteriological culture results, teat end condition, or milk flow rate. The study design was a 1-yr trial with a completely randomized block crossover. Holstein cows were blocked into 15 pairs of contemporaries. Both cows from each pair were milked with experimental pulsation and with conventional pulsation for 6 mo, in reverse order from each other. The SCC (217,000/ml) of experimentally milked cows was not significantly different from SCC of conventionally milked cows (175,000/ml). Mean milk flow rate was 5.2 lb/min (2.4 kg/min) for experimentally milked cows and 5.3 lb/min (2.4 kg/min) for conventionally milked cows, not significantly different. Differences among the experimentally and conventionally milked cows, respectively, in new (13.5 and 12.7%), chronic (12.9 and 8.9%), and negative (73.6 and 78.4%) quarter culture results were not significant. New IMI per 100 d of lactation were 1.50 and 1.46, and chronic IMI per 100 d were 1.85 and 1.27, for experimentally and conventionally milked cows, respectively. These IMI rates were not significantly different between pulsation types. There were more new Staphylococcus aureus IMI associated with conventional pulsation, but overall cases of Staph. aureus were similar between the two types of pulsation. Teat end scores for the experimentally and conventionally milked cows, respectively, were good (6.5 and 11.7%), intermediate (68.2 and 66.9%), and poor (25.3 and 21.4%), not significantly different. These results support previous studies, which have found that except for complete failure of pulsation, differences in pulsation characteristics apparently have little effect on milking and udder health.

Related Concept Videos

Assessment of apical radial pulse01:25

Assessment of apical radial pulse

Apical-Radial (A-R) Pulse Assessment
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation01:27

Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation

Palpation involves feeling the body to evaluate texture, size, consistency, and tenderness for assessing cardiovascular health. The following steps are organized in a head-to-toe order:
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above the...
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound01:19

Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound

To obtain accurate blood pressure measurements in clinical settings, especially when traditional methods are insufficient, healthcare professionals utilize the Doppler ultrasound technique. This method uses high-frequency sound waves to detect blood flow within the arteries, which is crucial for patients with conditions that complicate circulatory system assessment.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Special considerations while measuring pulse01:13

Special considerations while measuring pulse

Assessing a patient's pulse is a fundamental skill in healthcare, but certain situations require special attention: