Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of multiple point and statistical motor unit number estimation.

C Lomen-Hoerth1, R K Olney

  • 1Department of Neurology, Box 0114, University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, California 94143-0114, USA. cathylh@itsa.ucsf.edu

Muscle & Nerve
|September 26, 2000
PubMed
Summary

The statistical method for motor unit number estimation (MUNE) is more reproducible and faster than the multiple point stimulation technique. This finding supports the statistical method

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tissue informative cell-free DNA methylation sites in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2024
Same author

Non-recurrent SEPT9 duplications cause hereditary neuralgic amyotrophy.

Journal of medical genetics·2009
Same author

Enteral tube feeding for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2006
Same author

Guidelines in electrodiagnostic medicine. Consensus criteria for the diagnosis of partial conduction block.

Muscle & nerve. Supplement·2006
Same author

The effects of executive and behavioral dysfunction on the course of ALS.

Neurology·2005
Same author

Comparison of family histories in FTLD subtypes and related tauopathies.

Neurology·2005

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Electromyography
  • Motor Neuron Diseases

Background:

  • Motor Unit Number Estimation (MUNE) is crucial for assessing motor neuron diseases.
  • Reproducibility of MUNE techniques is vital for accurate disease monitoring.
  • Two common MUNE techniques are multiple point stimulation and the statistical method.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the reproducibility and speed of two MUNE techniques: multiple point stimulation and statistical method.
  • To determine which technique is more reliable for clinical use, particularly in tracking changes in MUNE over time.

Main Methods:

  • Surface-recorded motor unit action potentials (SMUPs) were measured in the hypothenar muscles of 20 controls and 10 ALS patients.
  • Both multiple point stimulation and statistical method were performed twice on each participant.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Electrodes were changed, and recordings were repeated to assess test-retest reliability.

    • Main Results:

    • The statistical method demonstrated higher reproducibility, with a test-retest correlation coefficient of 0.98 and a coefficient of variation of 7%.
    • Multiple point stimulation showed lower reproducibility (correlation coefficient 0.90, coefficient of variation 12%).
    • The statistical method was also found to be faster than the multiple point technique.

    Conclusions:

    • The statistical method is a more reproducible and efficient technique for MUNE compared to multiple point stimulation.
    • The enhanced reliability of the statistical method makes it suitable for monitoring disease progression in conditions like ALS.