Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Indications for filter placement.

M C Proctor1

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, USA.

Seminars in Vascular Surgery
|September 27, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Vena caval filters are used to prevent pulmonary embolism when anticoagulation is not possible or causes complications. Indications have expanded to include high-risk patients, requiring careful risk-benefit assessment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Current treatment and prevention of pulmonary embolus with the greenfield filter.

Surgical technology international·2015
Same author

Venous thrombosis incidence in burn patients: preliminary results of a prospective study.

The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation·2002
Same author

Computed tomographic venography is specific but not sensitive for diagnosis of acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis in patients with suspected pulmonary embolus.

Journal of vascular surgery·2001
Same author

A clinical comparison of pneumatic compression devices: the basis for selection.

Journal of vascular surgery·2001
Same author

Thromboprophylaxis in an academic medical center.

Cardiovascular surgery (London, England)·2001
Same author

Nitric oxide inhibition increases matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression by rat aortic smooth muscle cells in vitro.

Journal of vascular surgery·2001
Same journal

Management decisions for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia in 2026.

Seminars in vascular surgery·2026
Same journal

A critical analysis of the Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Trial (CREST-2) and the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST)-2.

Seminars in vascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Operationalizing patient and stakeholder engagement in high-acuity trials: Lessons from IMPROVE-AD.

Seminars in vascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Lost to follow-up: A narrative review of socioeconomic, psychosocial, and systemic barriers to aortic dissection surveillance.

Seminars in vascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Regulatory oversight, innovation, and access in aortic dissection care: The evolving roles of the US Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

Seminars in vascular surgery·2026
Same journal

What is the best thoracic endovascular aortic repair landing zone for Type B aortic dissection?

Seminars in vascular surgery·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Vascular surgery
  • Interventional radiology
  • Cardiology

Background:

  • Vena caval filters are devices used to prevent pulmonary embolism.
  • Traditional indications include contraindications or complications of anticoagulation therapy.
  • Physician perception of filter efficacy and safety influences placement decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the indications for vena caval filter placement.
  • To discuss the evolution of these indications.
  • To emphasize the importance of risk-benefit assessment for filter placement.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current medical literature and clinical practice guidelines.
  • Analysis of traditional and expanded indications for vena caval filters.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the risk-benefit profile of filter placement.

    • Main Results:

    • Traditional indications focus on patients unable to tolerate anticoagulation.
    • Expanded indications include prophylactic placement in high-risk pulmonary embolism patients.
    • The decision-making process requires careful consideration of individual patient risks and benefits.

    Conclusions:

    • Vena caval filter placement indications have evolved beyond traditional contraindications to anticoagulation.
    • Prophylactic use in high-risk patients is increasingly common.
    • Individualized risk-benefit evaluation and long-term outcome assessment are crucial for optimal patient management.