Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Filter complications and their management.

L J Greenfield1, M C Proctor

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

Seminars in Vascular Surgery
|September 27, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contralateral reperfusion injury after carotid endarterectomy.

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association·2015
Same author

Current treatment and prevention of pulmonary embolus with the greenfield filter.

Surgical technology international·2015
Same author

Venous thrombosis incidence in burn patients: preliminary results of a prospective study.

The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation·2002
Same author

Computed tomographic venography is specific but not sensitive for diagnosis of acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis in patients with suspected pulmonary embolus.

Journal of vascular surgery·2001
Same author

Burnout among American surgeons.

Surgery·2001
Same author

Renal artery aneurysms: a 35-year clinical experience with 252 aneurysms in 168 patients.

Annals of surgery·2001
Same journal

Management decisions for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia in 2026.

Seminars in vascular surgery·2026
Same journal

A critical analysis of the Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Trial (CREST-2) and the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST)-2.

Seminars in vascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Operationalizing patient and stakeholder engagement in high-acuity trials: Lessons from IMPROVE-AD.

Seminars in vascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Lost to follow-up: A narrative review of socioeconomic, psychosocial, and systemic barriers to aortic dissection surveillance.

Seminars in vascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Regulatory oversight, innovation, and access in aortic dissection care: The evolving roles of the US Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

Seminars in vascular surgery·2026
Same journal

What is the best thoracic endovascular aortic repair landing zone for Type B aortic dissection?

Seminars in vascular surgery·2026
See all related articles

Vena caval filters rarely cause complications, with most issues avoidable through proper technique. Interventions for rare mechanical problems often increase patient morbidity, so unnecessary procedures should be avoided.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Interventional Radiology

Background:

  • Vena caval filters are devices used to prevent pulmonary embolism.
  • Complications associated with vena caval filters can arise during placement, other procedures, or late in follow-up.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the potential complications of vena caval filters.
  • To discuss the management of filter-related complications.
  • To emphasize the risks associated with unnecessary interventions.

Main Methods:

  • Review of literature on vena caval filter complications.
  • Analysis of complication types, including placement issues, thrombus-related problems, and late mechanical failures.
  • Discussion of management strategies and the impact of interventions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Placement complications like bleeding and embolism are largely avoidable.
  • Technical difficulties have been reduced with improved equipment.
  • Late complications include rare strut fracture (0.05%) and penetration; functional significance is rare.
  • Filter obstruction and thrombus propagation can occur.
  • Unnecessary interventions increase patient morbidity.

Conclusions:

  • Vena caval filter complications are rare and often manageable.
  • Careful technique minimizes placement risks.
  • Late mechanical complications are infrequent and usually of minor consequence.
  • Avoidance of unnecessary interventions is crucial to prevent increased morbidity.