Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Counterfactual thinking about actions and failures to act.

R M Byrne1, A McEleney

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Ireland. rmbyrne@tcd.ie

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|September 29, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Counterfactual thinking typically focuses on actions over inactions. However, this study found no temporal switch from actions to inactions in long-term scenarios across four experiments, challenging prior assumptions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Counterfactual thinking about controllable events.

Memory & cognition·2000
Same author

The temporality effect in counterfactual thinking about what might have been.

Memory & cognition·2000
Same author

Deductive reasoning with factual, possible, and counterfactual conditionals.

Memory & cognition·1999
Same author

Reasoning strategies for suppositional deductions.

Cognition·1997
Same author

Propositional reasoning by model.

Psychological review·1992
Same author

Modal reasoning, models, and Manktelow and Over.

Cognition·1992

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Making
  • Counterfactual Thinking

Background:

  • Counterfactual thinking involves mentally altering past events to explore alternative outcomes.
  • Previous research suggested a temporal shift in counterfactual focus, from actions in the short term to inactions in the long term.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the temporal switch in counterfactual focus (actions vs. inactions) across different scenarios.
  • To examine whether situational factors influence the focus on actions or inactions in long-term counterfactuals.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted with a total of 456 participants.
  • Participants evaluated emotional impact and frequency of "if-only" thoughts in various scenarios (investment, college choice).
  • Scenarios varied in timeframe (short-term vs. long-term), outcome (good vs. bad), and actor/nonactor roles.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No consistent temporal pattern emerged; the focus on actions over inactions persisted across short- and long-term perspectives.
  • This lack of temporal switching was observed in investment and college choice scenarios, regardless of outcome valence or initial situation.
  • Even when investment losses were equal for actors and nonactors, the focus remained on actions.

Conclusions:

  • The hypothesized temporal switch from focusing on actions to inactions in long-term counterfactuals was not supported.
  • Situational factors, such as the explicit availability of mental representations of actions and inactions, may play a more significant role.
  • Future research should explore the conditions under which different counterfactual foci emerge.