The do-not-resuscitate decision: the context, process, and consequences of DNR orders

This study examines the process and consequences of an increasingly important element of the dying experience in American hospitals: the writing of a Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) order. The focus of the study is on the decision-making process and timing of the DNR decision, the impact of the DNR order on the dying experience, and the consequences of the DNR order for length of hospital stay and accrued medical charges. Patients with a DNR order are compared to those who were unsuccessfully coded. Data are obtained from a review and analysis of the medical charts and death monitor sheets of a sample of 249 persons who died in 1994 in a single teaching hospital. The study found physicians routinely discuss the DNR decision with patients and/or their surrogates (though patients are involved in the decision in only about one-third of cases) and that the decision is often made relatively early in the hospital stay. The dying experience of patients with a written DNR was different in significant ways from the experience of unsuccessfully-coded patients. Those with a DNR were more likely to remain in a single unit in the hospital and less likely to die in an intensive care unit or while connected to a ventilator. Consistent with other studies, however, average length of hospital stay and average medical charges were actually higher for the DNR patients. Implications of these differences between DNR and unsuccessfully-coded patients are discussed.