Powered laryngeal shavers and laryngeal papillomatosis: a preliminary report

Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser ablation is widely accepted as the most effective first line surgical treatment of recurrent laryngeal papilloma. However, vaporization of papilloma with the CO2 laser exposes the patient and staff to a potentially infective plume. Furthermore, unsuitable pathological tissue specimens and scarring of the surrounding laryngeal architecture are inevitable consequences of the thermal energy generated by this instrument. Following their innovative use in endonasal surgery, powered laryngeal microresecting instruments (Xomed Shavers) have been developed for laryngeal surgery. We assessed the value of these new instruments in five patients who had previously undergone laser ablation. All of the patients reported that their postoperative recovery was the 'same as' or 'better than' that following laser surgery. The surgeon reported that though there was more bleeding, shaver excision of papilloma provided good clearance of disease; easy collection of pathological samples; and a potentially safer and faster alternative to laser excision.