Smokers eligible for a clinical trial. Correlates of not returning for randomization
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Recruitment and retention of minority participants is often the rate-limiting step towards successful completion of clinical trials. Participants who are eligible, and express interest in, enrolling into a trial will sometimes not return for their randomization visit. Factors associated with failure to return for randomization are largely unknown.METHODS: We compared 287 eligible African American (AA) smokers who enrolled, but did not return for randomization (NR), to 500 AA smokers who returned and were randomized (R) to participate in a study comparing culturally sensitive educational materials to usual care materials for smoking cessation in AAs. An analysis was conducted on variables potentially associated with not returning for randomization.RESULTS:Table 1CONCLUSIONS: Potential NR participants differed in a number of ways from those who returned for randomization. Better understanding of these factors may allow researchers to target recruitment efforts, potentially resulting in enhanced accrual and retention, and therefore, generalizability.
More Related Videos
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Research
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Blinding
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
