Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Limits to vision: can we do better than nature?

R A Applegate¹

¹Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 78230-6230, USA. applegate@uthscsa.edu

Journal of Refractive Surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)

|October 6, 2000

Summary

Optimally correcting the human eye's optical errors with wavefront sensing can enhance vision. These advanced corrections, aligned with eye optics, may improve visual acuity to the limits of photoreceptor spacing.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Noninvasive assessment of the visual system and ophthalmic and visual optics: an introduction to the joint vision features.

Applied optics·2010

Same author

Is biomedical research a national priority?

Applied optics·2010

Same author

Non-invasive assessment of the visual system: introduction by the feature editors.

Applied optics·2010

Same author

Noninvasive assessment of the visual system: introduction by the feature editors.

Applied optics·2010

Same author

Noninvasive assessment of the visual system features in Applied Optics: goals and history.

Applied optics·2010

Same author

Noninvasive assessment of the visual function: an introduction.

Applied optics·2010

Area of Science:

Ophthalmology
Optical Engineering
Vision Science

Background:

Non-invasive wavefront sensing measures monochromatic optical errors beyond sphere and cylinder.
These errors necessitate precise alignment with eye optics for effective correction.
Current correction methods include contact lenses, refractive surgery, and intraocular lenses.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the limits of optical and neural design in the human eye for vision correction.
To determine if "ideal" optical corrections lead to significant improvements in visual acuity.
To assess the potential of advanced optical corrections for enhancing image quality.

Main Methods:

Utilizing non-invasive wavefront sensing to identify higher-order aberrations in the human eye.
Analyzing the impact of pupil size on the effectiveness of optical corrections.
Comparing the potential visual acuity with "ideal" corrections against photoreceptor spacing limits.

Main Results:

"Ideal" corrections improve retinal image quality beyond photoreceptor spacing limits for pupils larger than 3 mm.
Photoreceptor spacing currently limits visual acuity to a range of 20/8 to 20/10.
Perfected "ideal" corrections offer high-contrast visual acuity within the 20/8 to 20/10 range.

Conclusions:

Advanced optical corrections can significantly enhance visual performance.
The neural design, specifically photoreceptor spacing, ultimately limits achievable visual acuity.
Wavefront-guided corrections promise crisper images and higher contrast, approaching the eye's theoretical visual limits.

Related Experiment Videos