Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessment of the relationship between box weight and trunk kinematics: does a reduction in box weight necessarily

K G Davis1, W S Marras

  • 1Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA.

Human Factors
|October 7, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Job Rotation: Biomechanical Risk, Body Discomfort, and Psychosocial Demands.

Human factors·2026
Same author

Assessment of the occupational exposures within homes for home healthcare workers in the United Kingdom.

Human factors in healthcare·2025
Same author

An Ergonomic Comparison of Data Entry Work Using a Keyboard vs. Touch Screen Input Device While Standing and Sitting.

Journal of ergonomics·2025
Same author

An EMG-driven biomechanical model of the canine cervical spine.

Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology·2017
Same author

MRI cross sectional atlas of normal canine cervical musculoskeletal structure.

Research in veterinary science·2016
Same author

A quantitative description of typing biomechanics.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2013

Reducing box weight may not prevent low back injuries. Worker interaction with the box is crucial, as spinal loads increase significantly with weights over 25 kg, impacting ergonomic strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational biomechanics
  • Ergonomics
  • Spinal injury research

Background:

  • Low back injuries are costly, with reduced box weight being a primary ergonomic solution.
  • Limited research exists on how worker interaction with boxes influences injury risk.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the impact of reduced box weight on trunk kinematics, moments, and spinal loads.
  • To investigate the relationship between box weight, lifting dynamics, and spinal loading.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of weight-based ergonomic interventions.

Main Methods:

  • 15 participants performed lifting, carrying, and placing tasks with boxes ranging from 9.1 to 41.7 kg.
  • Trunk kinematics, moments, and estimated spinal loads were measured.
  • Analysis focused on how varying box weights affected biomechanical variables.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Small increases in lower box weights (3-9 kg) were compensated by trunk dynamics, showing no change in spinal loads.
  • Spinal loads significantly increased for box weights exceeding 25 kg.
  • Worker interaction dynamics play a critical role in determining spinal loads.

Conclusions:

  • Weight-based ergonomic controls alone may be insufficient for reducing low back disorder risk.
  • Considering worker-box interaction is vital for effective ergonomic interventions.
  • Complex spinal load models are beneficial for evaluating dynamic lifting tasks.