Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Team mental models: techniques, methods, and analytic approaches.

J Langan-Fox1, S Code, K Langfield-Smith

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. j.langan-fox@psych.unimelb.edu.au

Human Factors
|October 7, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Role reward and role stress in managerial and professional women.

Psychological reports·1992
Same author

Shared governance: a Canadian experience.

Canadian journal of nursing administration·1991
Same journal

Effects of Task Priority and Difficulty in Multitasking Across Screens.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Compatibility Effects With Simple Lever Tools: A Replication and Extension Beyond Simple Button Responses.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Effects of Egocentric and Exocentric Supervisor Viewpoint Perspectives on Motion Plan Legibility and Decision Support in Automated Spacecraft Docking Maneuvers.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

System-Wide Trust (SWT) Versus Component-Specific Trust (CST) in Multi-Agent Human-Agent Teams: Individual Variability in Trust Bias.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Driver Adaptation to Partially Automated Driving in Urban Environments: Effects of Repeated Exposure and System Capabilities on Drivers' Trust, Monitoring, and Response.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Modeling Human Expertise in a Sanding Task.

Human factors·2026
See all related articles

Measuring team mental models is crucial for effective teamwork. This study reviews methods for eliciting, representing, and analyzing team mental models, offering guidance for research and practical applications in organizations.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Effective team functioning relies on shared team mental models.
  • Current methods for measuring team mental models lack clarity and standardization.
  • Existing techniques vary significantly in elicitation, analysis, and representation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and evaluate various methods for measuring team mental models.
  • To provide recommendations for selecting and developing appropriate measurement techniques.
  • To address the need for standardized and practical approaches in organizational research.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature review of existing team mental model measurement techniques.
  • Focus on a case study involving method selection for industry-based team mental model examination.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of methods based on applicability, practical considerations, and theoretical rationale.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified strengths and weaknesses of diverse methods for eliciting, representing, and analyzing mental models.
    • Described processes for selecting and developing suitable methods for specific research problems.
    • Provided an evaluation of a method matched to an industry research context.

    Conclusions:

    • Clear criteria for method selection (applicability, practicality, theoretical basis) are essential.
    • The research offers practical techniques for analyzing team mental models in organizational settings.
    • Recommendations are provided for future research and development of mental model methodologies.