Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Intermittency in the control of continuous force production.

A B Slifkin1, D E Vaillancourt, K M Newell

  • 1Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.

Journal of Neurophysiology
|October 12, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Altered Functional Brain Connectivity in Dyt1 Knock-in mouse models.

Dystonia (Lausanne, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Cell-specific Dyt1 ∆GAG knock-in to basal ganglia and cerebellum reveal differential effects on motor behavior and sensorimotor network function.

Experimental neurology·2023
Same author

Cell-specific effects of Dyt1 knock-out on sensory processing, network-level connectivity, and motor deficits.

Experimental neurology·2021
Same author

Effects of ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation across multiple effectors in essential tremor.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2019
Same author

Task experience influences coordinative structures and performance variables in learning a slalom ski-simulator task.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2018
Same author

The pattern of coupling dynamics between postural motion, isotonic hand movements and physiological tremor.

Neuroscience letters·2014
Same journal

Deep Learning Reveals Cross-Modal Neural Representations of Auditory and Visual Mental Imagery in MEG.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Speech sensorimotor adaptation in young adult cochlear implant users with early implantation.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

How Visual Context Influences Lateral Stepping Regulation While Walking on Winding Paths.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Simultaneous neuron evidence for much higher covariation with saccadic reaction time of superior colliculus than primary visual cortex visual responses.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Separate Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Regions Participate in Distinct Large-Scale Networks Differentially Recruited for Social and Cognitive Control Functions.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive Analysis of Auditory Nerve Fiber Responses using Fiber-Specific Modeling.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Visual feedback intermittency impacts force control. Higher feedback frequencies improved performance, with optimal visual information integration around 150 ms for motor corrections.

Area of Science:

  • Motor control
  • Human-computer interaction
  • Human factors engineering

Background:

  • Continuous force production requires precise motor control.
  • Intermittent visual feedback can affect motor performance.
  • Understanding visual information processing limits is crucial for human-machine systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how intermittent visual feedback influences continuous force production.
  • To determine the optimal frequency of visual feedback for motor control.
  • To analyze the relationship between visual processing and motor output corrections.

Main Methods:

  • Participants maintained a target force with minimized variability.
  • Visual feedback presentation frequency was manipulated (0.2 to 25.6 Hz).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Force output variability and spectral power were analyzed.

    • Main Results:

    • Force variability decreased hyperbolically with increased feedback frequency, plateauing at 6.4 Hz.
    • Optimal visual information integration for error correction occurred within approximately 150 ms.
    • Reductions in force variability correlated with decreased low-frequency (1 Hz) power in force output.

    Conclusions:

    • Motor system corrections occur with a lag relative to visual feedback processing.
    • A model suggests visual information is accumulated (max 6.4 Hz) before motor correction (1 Hz).
    • This research provides insights into the temporal dynamics of visual-motor integration.