Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Benchmarks for evaluating health care networks].

P Lombrail1, Y Bourgueil, A Develay

  • 1Laboratoire de santé publique et d'épidémiologie, Faculté de médecine et CHU, Nantes.

Sante Publique (Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France)
|October 12, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Evaluating health care networks requires robust information systems to assess economic and health outcomes. Establishing clear evaluation benchmarks is crucial for demonstrating network effectiveness and efficiency.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Early Palliative Care Team's Perception of Relational Work for Advanced Cancer Patients: A Qualitative Study.

Psycho-oncology·2025
Same author

Prevention of early childhood caries in France, potential perspectives for interprofessional action: a scoping review.

Journal of interprofessional care·2025
Same author

A conceptual framework to develop a patient-reported experience questionnaire on the cystic fibrosis journey in France: the ExPaParM collaborative study.

Orphanet journal of rare diseases·2023
Same author

Collaborative research protocol to define patient-reported experience measures of the cystic fibrosis care pathway in France: the ExPaParM study.

Orphanet journal of rare diseases·2022
Same author

[Social inequalities in oral health and early childhood caries: How can they be effectively prevented? A scoping review of disease predictors].

Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique·2020
Same author

Interprofessional collaboration in primary health care: a review of facilitators and barriers perceived by involved actors.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2014

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Healthcare Management
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Implementation of health care networks introduces significant changes in professional practices.
  • Economic, organizational, and political factors create new challenges for evaluating healthcare initiatives.
  • Existing information systems are vital for developing effective evaluation methodologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the necessity of information systems for evaluating health care networks.
  • To underscore the importance of defining reference points for network evaluation.
  • To explore strategies for demonstrating the effectiveness and efficiency of health care networks.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing existing information systems to develop evaluation methodologies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Describing effects in economic terms, health outcomes, and qualitative aspects.
  • Establishing reference points for evaluating health care networks.

    • Main Results:

    • Information systems are essential for comprehensive evaluation of health care networks.
    • Evaluation must consider economic, health, and qualitative outcomes.
    • Defined benchmarks aid in demonstrating network effectiveness and efficiency.

    Conclusions:

    • Developing robust evaluation strategies for health care networks is critical.
    • Leveraging information systems and setting clear benchmarks enhances understanding of network performance.
    • Learning from experimentation through effective evaluation drives improvements in healthcare delivery.