Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Safe Dates program: 1-year follow-up results.

V A Foshee1, K E Bauman, W F Greene

  • 1School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27599-7400, USA. vfoshee@sph.unc.edu

American Journal of Public Health
|October 13, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predictors of Engagement With a Digital Family-Based Dating Violence Prevention Program for Adolescents Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence.

Health promotion practice·2026
Same author

eMoms and Teens for Safe Dates: a Single Arm Pre-post Study of Preliminary Efficacy.

Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research·2026
Same author

Responders vs clinical response: a critical analysis of data from linaclotide phase 3 clinical trials in IBS-C.

Neurogastroenterology and motility·2014
Same author

On the measurement of friend behavior in research on friend influence and selection: Findings from longitudinal studies of adolescent smoking and drinking.

Journal of youth and adolescence·2013
Same author

An evaluation of the FDA responder endpoint for IBS-C clinical trials: analysis of data from linaclotide Phase 3 clinical trials.

Neurogastroenterology and motility·2013
Same author

Population growth rates in perfect contraceptive populations.

Population studies·2011
Same journal

Erratum In: "Ogunbajo et al. Respond".

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

The Role of Gender in HIV Care Engagement Among Individuals Assigned Male Sex at Birth: Medical Monitoring Project, United States, 2015-2022.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Domestic Returns to Predictable US Participation in the World Health Organization: Health Security and Cost.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

The Risks of Mortality, Cardiovascular Events, and Pulmonary Complications in Cancer Patients Who Smoke Cigarettes and Switch to E-Cigarettes: South Korea, 2015‒2022.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Retailers CARE Program in Montgomery County, Ohio, Partners With Alcohol, Tobacco, and Lottery Retailers to Promote Healthier Communities.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Trends in Sexual Activity, Condom Use, and Use of Pregnancy Prevention Methods Among Female Adolescents: United States, 2007-2023.

American journal of public health·2026
See all related articles

The Safe Dates program

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Adolescent Health
  • Violence Prevention

Background:

  • The Safe Dates program previously showed positive 1-month outcomes for reducing dating violence.
  • Mediators influencing the program's effectiveness were identified in earlier research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the long-term (1-year) effects of the Safe Dates program.
  • To assess the maintenance of program effects on dating violence and its mediators.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 14 schools.
  • Data collected via pre-program and 1-year post-program questionnaires.

Main Results:

  • Short-term behavioral improvements in dating violence were not sustained at 1 year.

Related Experiment Videos

  • However, effects on mediators like dating violence norms, conflict resolution skills, and awareness of support services persisted.

    • Conclusions:

    • Programmatic behavioral effects may decay over time without continued intervention.
    • The findings suggest the potential need for booster sessions to maintain program impact.