Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Put prevention into practice: a controlled evaluation.

J Melnikow1, N D Kohatsu, B K Chan

  • 1Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, USA. jamelnikow@ucdavis.edu

American Journal of Public Health
|October 13, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Precision Measurement of Net-Proton-Number Fluctuations in Au+Au Collisions at RHIC.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Onset of Constituent Quark Number Scaling in Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Measurement of In-Medium Jet Modification Using Direct Photon+Jet and π^{0}+Jet Correlations in p+p and Central Au+Au Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=200  GeV.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Erratum: Measurement of the Sixth-Order Cumulant of Net-Proton Multiplicity Distributions in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=27, 54.4, and 200 GeV at RHIC [Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 262301 (2021)].

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Erratum: Nonmonotonic Energy Dependence of Net-Proton Number Fluctuations [Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 092301 (2021)].

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Observation of Strong Nuclear Suppression in Exclusive J/ψ Photoproduction in Au+Au Ultraperipheral Collisions at RHIC.

Physical review letters·2024
Same journal

Erratum In: "Ogunbajo et al. Respond".

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

The Role of Gender in HIV Care Engagement Among Individuals Assigned Male Sex at Birth: Medical Monitoring Project, United States, 2015-2022.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Domestic Returns to Predictable US Participation in the World Health Organization: Health Security and Cost.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

The Risks of Mortality, Cardiovascular Events, and Pulmonary Complications in Cancer Patients Who Smoke Cigarettes and Switch to E-Cigarettes: South Korea, 2015‒2022.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Retailers CARE Program in Montgomery County, Ohio, Partners With Alcohol, Tobacco, and Lottery Retailers to Promote Healthier Communities.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Trends in Sexual Activity, Condom Use, and Use of Pregnancy Prevention Methods Among Female Adolescents: United States, 2007-2023.

American journal of public health·2026
See all related articles

The Put Prevention Into Practice (PPIP) materials initially improved clinical preventive services delivery. However, sustained improvement in preventive care requires significant system changes and ongoing support.

Area of Science:

  • Preventive Medicine
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Clinical preventive services are crucial for population health.
  • The Put Prevention Into Practice (PPIP) initiative aimed to improve the delivery of these services.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of Put Prevention Into Practice (PPIP) materials on the delivery of 8 clinical preventive services.

Main Methods:

  • A family medicine practice serving a diverse, low-income population received PPIP materials.
  • Medical record reviews were conducted at baseline, 6, 18, and 30 months at intervention and control sites to assess service delivery.

Main Results:

  • Delivery rates for 7 clinical preventive services increased at the intervention site by 6 months.

Related Experiment Videos

  • These improved rates plateaued or declined by the 30-month follow-up.

    • Conclusions:

    • PPIP materials led to a modest, short-term improvement in the delivery of select clinical preventive services.
    • Sustaining improvements in preventive care necessitates significant systemic modifications and continuous support.