Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2026

Stimulated Single Fiber Electromyography (SFEMG) for Assessing Neuromuscular Junction Transmission in Rodent Models
Published on: March 8, 2024
Train-of-four fade and neuromuscular block in rats: a comparison between pancuronium, vecuronium, and rocuronium
1Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Kanazawa University, Japan. hironori@med.kanazawa-u.ac.jp
Purpose:
To clarify the relationship between neuromuscular block and train-of-four fade and to investigate the causes of these drug-dependent differences, we compared the neuromuscular block and TOF fade after pancuronium, vecuronium and rocuronium.
Methods:
In 24 anesthetized rats, the sciatic nerve was stimulated, and the twitch of left tibialis anterior muscle was recorded. After T1 (first twitch response) was kept constant at 95% block by administration of pancuronium, vecuronium, or rocuronium (n=8, in each), the TOF fade was measured when T1 block was decreased to 40% and 20%. In addition, using 24 phrenic nerve-diaphragm preparations, the fade was measured when the T1 block increased to 20% and 40% by titrating of either one of the three drugs (n=8, in each).
Results:
In in vivo experiments, the fade produced by pancuronium was greater than that by vecuronium or rocuronium when T1 block was at 40% (81 +/- 9 vs 63 +/- 15 and 63 +/- 6%, respectively) and at 20% (66 +/- 13 vs 34 +/- 17 and 40 +/- 6%, respectively). In contrast, in in vitro experiments, the differences did not reach significant levels among the three drugs either at 20% (32 +/- 19 vs 33 +/- 10 and 32 +/- 17%) or 40% of block (62 +/- 29 vs 65 +/- 14 and 55 +/- 14%).
Conclusions:
For vecuronium and rocuronium, the results were similar in vivo and in vitro. For pancuronium, fade was greater in vivo. These results suggest that different neuromuscular blocking agent have different relationships between the fade and the block. In vitro results might not be the same as in vivo, possibly due to pharmacokinetic differences.
Related Concept Videos
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacokinetics
Instead, they are transported by the blood to different tissues. Muscles with a greater blood supply (arteries) and blood flow receive more...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...
Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because succinylcholine...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics

