Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Location selection in the visual domain.

R H Van der Lubbe1, J C Woestenburg

  • 1Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. lubbe_r@neuro.mu-luebeck.de

Psychophysiology
|October 19, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Focused attention reduces the effect of lateral interference in multi-element arrays.

Psychological research·2001
Same author

The influence of time pressure and cue validity on response force in an S1-S2 paradigm.

Acta psychologica·2000
Same author

Dimensional overlap between arrows as cueing stimuli and responses?. Evidence from contra-ipsilateral differences in EEG potentials.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2000
Same author

Lateralized EEG components with direction information for the preparation of saccades versus finger movements.

Experimental brain research·2000
Same author

The influence of peripheral precues on the tendency to react towards a lateral relevant stimulus with multiple-item arrays.

Biological psychology·1999
Same author

Modulation of early ERP components with peripheral precues: a trend analysis.

Biological psychology·1997

Visual attention involves location selection, with different brain responses (P1 and N2 components) depending on the task. This study shows these brain signals reflect location selection timing across various visual tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Attentional selection of visual stimuli is often conceptualized as location selection.
  • Location selection can be automatic, directly controlled, or indirectly controlled based on task demands.
  • Previous research shows distinct event-related potential (ERP) components (P1 and N2) lateralized differently in symbolic cueing versus visual search tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if lateralized P1 and N2 components reflect location selection influenced by its timing.
  • To differentiate the role of P1 and N2 components in location selection across different task types.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed tasks involving linear arrays with targets and distractors, preceded by cues specifying target location, side, or all positions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Array-evoked ERPs were recorded and analyzed, correcting for cue-evoked and interactive effects.
  • Analysis focused on lateralized and target location-specific effects for P1 and N2 components.

    • Main Results:

    • Both P1 and N2 components exhibited lateralized effects.
    • Target location-specific effects were observed for both P1 and N2 components.
    • These findings support the hypothesis that P1 and N2 reflect location selection at different points in time.

    Conclusions:

    • The P1 and N2 components are influenced by location selection processes.
    • The timing of location selection differs between task types, reflected by either the P1 or N2 component.
    • This provides evidence for a unified view of location selection in visual attention.