Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
Structure activity relationship of carboxylic ester antagonists of the vitamin D(3) receptor
Y Bury1, A Steinmeyer, C Carlberg
1Institut für Physiologische Chemie I and Biomedizinisches Forschungszentrum, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Abstract:
A 25-carboxylic ester analog of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) [1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3)], ZK159222 (compound 1), was recently described as a novel type of antagonist of 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) signaling. In this study five derivatives of compound 1 (compounds 2-6) were selected because of their sensitivity in facilitating complex formation between the 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) receptor (VDR) and the retinoid X receptor on a 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) response element that was comparable to that of the natural hormone (0.2-0.9 nM). Most derivatives of compound 1 reacted as typical agonists, because they were able to promote ligand-dependent interaction of the VDR with the coactivator TIF2, stabilized the VDR preferentially in its agonistic conformation c1(LPD), and stimulated VDR-dependent gene activity with a potency similar to 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3). In contrast, only compound 2 showed the antagonistic profile of compound 1, which includes the incompetence to induce a VDR-TIF2 contact, the stabilization of the antagonistic conformation c2(LPD), and only a very weak and insensitive functional activity. Accordingly, only compounds 1 and 2, but not compounds 3 to 6, showed prominent antagonistic effects in cellular systems. The comparison of the structures of the compounds indicates that the essential requirements for an antagonistic function are a cyclopropyl ring at carbon 25, a hydroxy group at carbon 24, and at least a butylester. Interestingly, compound 2 was an approximately 3 times more sensitive antagonist than compound 1 and even displayed a lower residual agonistic activity. In conclusion, only a very limited number of structural variations of compound 1 are possible to keep its antagonistic profile, but the tools presented here for their in vitro evaluation allow an accurate prediction of the effects and are suited to screening for even more potent 1alpha, 25(OH)(2)D(3) antagonists.
More Related Videos
09:07Detecting the Ligand-binding Domain Dimerization Activity of Estrogen Receptor Alpha Using the Mammalian Two-Hybrid Assay
Published on: December 19, 2018
08:18Methodology for Studying Interactions of Vitamin A Membrane Receptors and Opsin Protein with their Ligands in Generating the Retinylidene Protein
Published on: October 4, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Alkylation of β-Diester Enolates: Malonic Ester Synthesis
Direct-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
The direct-acting...
Indirect-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Reversible inhibitors display short to medium durations of action. Short-acting agents include simple alcohols with...
Indirect-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Mechanism of Action
Reversible inhibitors like edrophonium bind to a specific part of the enzyme called the anionic catalytic site. They form noncovalent bonds, which means they are not strongly attached to the enzyme. This creates a temporary and less stable enzyme–inhibitor complex, leading to...
Cholinergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Aromatic ring substitutions: Substituting the aromatic ring with –OH groups at positions 3 and 4 yields catecholamines (e.g., epinephrine), which have a high affinity for adrenoceptors. Hydrogen bonding between –OH groups and receptors enhances adrenergic activity.
Separation of the aromatic...