Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mechanisms for seeing transparency-from-motion and orientation-from-motion.

L Poom1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Sweden. Leo.Poom@psyk.uu.se

Perception
|October 21, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Structure-from-motion perception relies on neural units processing near-far relationships. Oscillating motion or orientation reduces subjective reversals, indicating these units are direction-selective and shared for depth estimation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual summation of luminance lines and illusory contours induced by pictorial, motion, and disparity cues.

Vision research·2001
Same author

Visual inter-attribute contour completion.

Perception·2001
Same author

Inter-attribute tilt effects and orientation analysis in the visual brain.

Vision research·2000
Same author

Perceptual depth synthesis in the visual system as revealed by selective adaptation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1999

Area of Science:

  • Computational neuroscience
  • Visual perception
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Structure-from-motion (SFM) perception involves interpreting 3D structure from 2D motion.
  • Hypothesized neural units mediate transparency-from-motion (TFM) and orientation-from-motion (OFM), sensing near-far relationships.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the properties of neural units involved in SFM perception.
  • To determine if TFM and OFM are processed by distinct or common neural mechanisms.
  • To examine the effect of motion and orientation oscillations on subjective reversals in ambiguous SFM displays.

Main Methods:

  • Ambiguous SFM displays were presented to observers.
  • The direction of rotation or surface orientation was oscillated during observation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The frequency of subjective reversals was measured under different conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Oscillating motion or orientation significantly decreased the frequency of subjective reversals.
    • These manipulations were found to impede the adaptation of TFM and OFM selective units.
    • Both TFM and OFM units demonstrated direction-selectivity.
    • Reducing TFM to zero did not affect the reversal rate.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings support the view that common neural units are responsible for estimating depth order when both TFM and OFM are present.
    • Neural units involved in SFM perception are direction-selective.
    • Adaptation of TFM and OFM units can be modulated by manipulating motion and orientation parameters.