Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Dermal exposure assessment.

T Schneider1, J W Cherrie, R Vermeulen

  • 1National Institute of Occupational Health, Lerso Parkalle 105, DK 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. ts@ami.dk

The Annals of Occupational Hygiene
|October 24, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Night shift work in early pregnancy and risk of preterm birth among Dutch nurses in the Nightingale Study.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Accounting for Mobility in Air Pollution Exposure Estimates in Studies on Long-Term Health Effects.

Research report (Health Effects Institute)·2025
Same author

Pesticide residues in bedroom dust: occurrence, determinants, and health risk assessment.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2025
Same author

Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and incident glomerulonephritis.

International journal of hygiene and environmental health·2025
Same author

Comparison of Long-Term Air Pollution Exposure from Mobile and Routine Monitoring, Low-Cost Sensors, and Dispersion Models.

Research report (Health Effects Institute)·2025
Same author

Letter: Robins-E risk of bias tool.

Environment international·2025
Same journal

Response to Article by Prof. Hans Kromhout, Hygiene Without Numbers.

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2016
Same journal

Development of an Interception Glove Sampler for Skin Exposures to Aromatic Isocyanates.

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2016
Same journal

When Are Risk Analyses on Job Titles Informative?

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2016
Same journal

Differential Counting of Asbestos Using Phase Contrast and Fluorescence Microscopy.

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2016
Same journal

The Validity and Applicability of Using a Generic Exposure Assessment Model for Occupational Exposure to Nano-Objects and Their Aggregates and Agglomerates.

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2016
Same journal

A New Miniature Respirable Sampler for In-mask Sampling: Part 1-Particle Size Selection Performance.

The Annals of occupational hygiene·2016
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Accurate dermal exposure assessment is challenging due to method limitations. A new strategy, inspired by airborne contaminant analysis, proposes uptake as the key metric for occupational exposure limits.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational hygiene
  • Environmental science
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • Dermal exposure assessment methods have significant limitations.
  • There are substantial gaps in the validation and documentation of sampling techniques.
  • Uncertainties also exist in measurement strategies for skin contaminants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel strategy for dermal exposure assessment.
  • To leverage insights from airborne contaminant assessment for dermal exposure.
  • To establish uptake as the primary metric for risk assessment and occupational exposure limits.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a conceptual model for dermal exposure.
  • Adaptation of principles from airborne contaminant sampling (e.g., EN 689).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Consideration of contaminant transport rates from the skin surface.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed strategy aims to improve the reliability of dermal exposure assessments.
    • Understanding contaminant transport rates is crucial for developing effective measurement principles.
    • The study highlights the need for better statistical understanding of skin contaminant distribution.

    Conclusions:

    • Uptake should be the definitive metric for dermal exposure in risk assessment.
    • Occupational exposure limits for dermal contaminants should be based on uptake.
    • The proposed strategy offers a path towards more robust dermal exposure evaluations.