Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The scope and limits of conscientious objection.

B M Dickens1, R J Cook

  • 1Faculty of Law, Faculty of Medicine and Joint Center for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. bernard.dickens@utoronto.ca

International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
|October 25, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Suppression of Take-All of Wheat by Seed Treatments with Fluorescent Pseudomonads.

Phytopathology·2025
Same author

Declining levels of serum chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10 over time are associated with new onset of psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis: a new biomarker?

The British journal of dermatology·2020
Same author

Validation of an Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS) tool for use in oral mucous membrane pemphigoid.

The British journal of dermatology·2019
Same author

Goftte: A R package for assessing goodness-of-fit in proportional (sub) distributions hazards regression models.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2019
Same author

Certification and the American Phytopathological Society.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

From Discovery to Use: Traversing the World of Commercializing Biocontrol Agents for Plant Disease Control.

Plant disease·2019

Religious freedom allows healthcare professionals to refuse procedures based on conscientious objections, but not in life-saving situations. Referrals and accessible alternative providers are required when objections arise.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Healthcare Law
  • Religious Freedom in Medicine

Background:

  • Conscientious objection is a recognized principle in healthcare.
  • Balancing individual religious beliefs with patient care obligations presents ethical challenges.
  • Existing legal frameworks address healthcare professionals' rights to refuse participation in certain medical procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the scope and limitations of conscientious objection for healthcare providers.
  • To clarify obligations regarding patient care, referrals, and accessibility of services.
  • To define the rights and responsibilities of physicians, nurses, and students in relation to medical procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of legal principles and ethical guidelines concerning religious freedom and medical practice.
Keywords:
Bioethics and Professional EthicsReligious Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of case law and professional conduct standards.
  • Examination of institutional policies and administrative responsibilities.

    • Main Results:

    • Healthcare professionals can refuse participation based on conscientious objections, except in emergencies requiring life-saving or health-preserving interventions.
    • Physicians must refer patients to non-objecting providers; administrators must ensure provider accessibility.
    • Nurses' objections apply to direct participation, not indirect aid; students can object to performing procedures but not to education.

    Conclusions:

    • Conscientious objection in healthcare is permissible within defined boundaries, prioritizing patient well-being and access to care.
    • Institutions generally cannot claim institutional objections and must avoid discrimination in hiring.
    • Clear guidelines are necessary to navigate the complexities of religious freedom and professional duties in healthcare.