[Personal experience with determination of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin]

Assessment of carbohydrate-deficient serum transferrin CDT) is considered a very useful indicator of alcohol abuse. There is a number of methods for assessment of CDT. In clinical practice most frequently assessment of the percentage ratio of CDT in transferrin is used. In our hospital we assessed CDT by the method of homogeneous immunoanalysis (Boehringer Mannheim (CDT-BM). Because we obtained a relatively high percentage of false results and because we found in the literature reference to a new method of homogeneous immunoanalysis (The Sanqui BioTech-CD-SB) with a different cut-off, we decided to compare the results of the estimations by the two methods and assess the percentage of false results. We examined a group of 49 patients incl. 16 who admitted alcohol abuse (> 60 g alcohol more than four times per week). As anticipated, we found that the %CDT assessed by the CDT-BM method was significantly higher than the percentage CDT-SB. After classification of the group into sub-groups with regard to alcohol intake the two sub-groups differed significantly only in values of CDT-SB and CDT-BM. In the group of patients with alcohol abuse we found relations between CDT-MB and indicators of hepatic lesions. In CDT-SB we found only an association with AST. This finding could suggest a greater specificity of CDT-SB. We confirmed data in the literature that GMT is independent on CDT and the mean corpuscular volume is independent on CDT in subjects with alcohol abuse. In abstainers who negated alcohol intake we found also when assessing CDT-SB a significant gender differentiation which is described in the literature (the reason is probably the fact that the CDT-SB method analyzes, contrary to CDT-BM, only asialo,-monosialo and disialylic isoforms of transferrin and women have higher levels of monosialylic forms). In our group the examination of %CDT by the new method, the Sanqui Biotech for alcohol abuse, had an almost absolute specificity and sensitivity. Contrary to the older Boehringer-Mannheim method we did not record any false increase in any patient with signs of hepatopathy nor any false negative results). We assume that the described methodical innovation of the analysis could facilitate the differential diagnosis of various diseases in different medical disciplines (internal medicine, neurology, psychiatry, assessment of work capacity).