Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Variations in a removable maxillary partial denture design by dentists.

W R Frantz

    The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
    |December 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary

    Dentists submitted 57 removable partial denture designs. While many were adequate, some designs could harm patients, highlighting the need for careful design considerations for oral health.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The use of natural teeth in overlay dentures.

    The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·1975
    Same author

    Variability in dentists' designs of a removable maxillary partial denture.

    The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·1973
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Dentistry
    • Prosthodontics
    • Biomaterials

    Background:

    • Removable partial dentures (RPDs) are common dental prostheses.
    • Proper RPD design is crucial for patient health and function.
    • Variability in RPD design among practitioners exists.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the adequacy and potential risks of various removable partial denture designs.
    • To emphasize the importance of dentist's attention to RPD design principles.

    Main Methods:

    • A survey of 57 dentists was conducted.
    • Each dentist submitted one design for a specific patient's removable partial denture.
    • Designs were assessed for functionality and potential oral health impact.

    Main Results:

    • Fifty-seven distinct removable partial denture designs were collected.
    • A significant number of submitted designs were deemed adequate for patient use.
    • Several designs presented potential risks and could be detrimental to patient oral health.

    Conclusions:

    • Dentist awareness and adherence to sound partial denture design principles are critical.
    • Inadequate RPD designs can negatively impact patient oral health and prosthesis longevity.
    • Focusing on functional and biocompatible RPD designs ensures better patient outcomes.

    Related Experiment Videos