Related Experiment Videos

Inhaled disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) as maintenance therapy in children with asthma: a systematic review

M J Tasche1, J H Uijen, R M Bernsen

  • 1Department of General Practice, Erasmus University, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Thorax
|October 26, 2000
PubMed

Insights

Disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) shows insufficient evidence for treating childhood asthma. Despite past inclusion in guidelines, recent analysis of trials suggests limited benefits for wheeze and cough, with potential publication bias affecting results.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Pulmonology
  • Clinical Pharmacology
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) was previously recommended in asthma treatment guidelines for children.
  • Its current clinical use in pediatric asthma management is infrequent.
  • This study re-evaluates the efficacy of DSCG based on published randomized controlled trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and interpret findings from all published randomized, placebo-controlled trials of inhaled DSCG for prophylactic treatment in children with asthma.
  • To assess the overall treatment effect and identify potential biases in the existing literature.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a comprehensive search of multiple databases to identify relevant randomized, placebo-controlled trials.
  • Included studies focused on children (0-18 years) receiving maintenance inhaled DSCG for asthma and published in English.
  • Assessed study quality, computed confidence intervals for treatment effects on cough and wheeze, pooled estimates, tested for homogeneity, and analyzed publication bias using funnel plots.

Main Results:

  • Identified 24 randomized, placebo-controlled trials with variable methodological quality.
  • Heterogeneity was detected among studies; overall confidence intervals for wheeze (0.11-0.26) and cough (0.13-0.27) were observed.
  • Tolerance intervals for both wheeze and cough included zero, indicating uncertainty in demonstrating a significant effect compared to placebo. Funnel plots suggested publication bias, with a lack of small, negative studies.

Conclusions:

  • Insufficient evidence supports the beneficial effect of DSCG as maintenance therapy for childhood asthma.
  • Apparent publication bias, small overall treatment effects, and tolerance intervals including zero contribute to this conclusion.
  • Re-evaluation suggests DSCG's role in pediatric asthma management may be limited based on current evidence.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos