Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Family practice research networks. Experiences from 3 countries.

C van Weel1, H Smith, J W Beasley

  • 1Department of Family Medicine, University of Nijmegen, and the Nijmegen Family Practice Academic Network, The Netherlands. CvanWeel@hsv.kun.nl

The Journal of Family Practice
|October 29, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessment of medical students' integrated clinical communication skills: development of a tailor-made assessment tool.

BMC medical education·2019
Same author

Students' experiences with a longitudinal skills training program on breaking bad news: A follow-up study.

Patient education and counseling·2018
Same author

Using Participatory Learning & Action (PLA) research techniques for inter-stakeholder dialogue in primary healthcare: an analysis of stakeholders' experiences.

Research involvement and engagement·2017
Same author

Implementing guidelines and training initiatives to improve cross-cultural communication in primary care consultations: a qualitative participatory European study.

International journal for equity in health·2017
Same author

Training general practitioners in early identification and anticipatory palliative care planning: a randomized controlled trial.

BMC family practice·2015
Same author

Routine control of oral contraceptive users: a new 'standard' in The Netherlands.

The International journal of risk & safety in medicine·2013
Same journal

Does taking BP medicine at night (vs morning) result in fewer cardiovascular events?

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

Preventing RSV in children and adults: A vaccine update.

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

Essential oils: How safe? How effective?

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

51-year-old woman • History of Graves disease • General fatigue, palpitations, and hand tremors • Dx?

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

Renewing the dream.

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

55-year-old woman • Myalgias and progressive symmetrical proximal weakness • History of unilateral renal agenesis, type 2 diabetes, and hyperlipidemia • Dx?

The Journal of family practice·2023
See all related articles

Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are crucial for family medicine research, providing data on patient populations and common illnesses. Despite variations in structure and funding challenges, these networks enhance the evidence base across different healthcare systems.

Area of Science:

  • Family Medicine Research
  • Health Services Research
  • Primary Care Research

Background:

  • Access to clinical data is vital for advancing family practice.
  • Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are increasingly important for data collection.
  • International comparison of PBRNs can reveal commonalities and differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the structure, mission, and function of three distinct Practice-based research networks (PBRNs).
  • To identify common elements and system-specific variations in PBRNs operating in different healthcare contexts.
  • To assess the contribution of PBRNs to the evidence base of family medicine.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of three PBRNs: Wisconsin (USA), Wessex (UK), and Nijmegen (Netherlands).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data organized and reviewed across four key areas: network mission, contribution to evidence base, management, and financing.
  • Focus on common morbidities and access to unselected patient populations.

    • Main Results:

    • PBRNs share an objective of extending the evidence base in family medicine, focusing on common conditions.
    • Networks provide access to diverse, unselected patient populations, though network size varies.
    • Common PBRN aspects exist across different healthcare systems, but local factors shape their structure and operations.
    • Networks evolve over time, with changing focus and activities.

    Conclusions:

    • Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are essential for family medicine development, offering valuable patient data.
    • Despite variations influenced by local healthcare systems, PBRNs demonstrate common goals and operational aspects.
    • Sustainable financial support remains a significant challenge for the infrastructure of these networks.