Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2026

Stable Isotope In-Vivo Labeling for Mass-Spectrometry Identification of Paternal Metabolites Transferred from Sperm to Oocyte During Fertilization
Published on: June 17, 2025
Parental duties and untreatable genetic conditions
1Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow.
Insights
Parents may have a duty to use prenatal genetic testing for non-treatable conditions. This duty applies only if the child faces a life worse than non-existence, potentially requiring pregnancy termination.
Area of Science:
- Bioethics
- Medical Ethics
- Reproductive Ethics
Background:
- Parental duties of beneficence and non-maleficence are central to reproductive decision-making.
- Prenatal genetic testing offers insights into potential non-treatable conditions.
- Ethical considerations arise regarding the use of such testing for conditions with severe implications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine parental duties concerning prenatal genetic testing for non-treatable conditions.
- To establish criteria for when prenatal testing becomes an ethical imperative.
- To explore the moral permissibility of terminating a pregnancy based on testing results.
Main Methods:
- Philosophical analysis of beneficence and non-maleficence principles.
- Ethical argumentation regarding the value of life and non-existence.
- Case-based reasoning applied to hypothetical scenarios of severe impairment.
Main Results:
- Parental duty to test exists only if the child's life risks being worse than non-existence.
- Non-existence can be rationally preferred over a life with uncontrollable pain and lack of self-development.
- Duty to terminate an affected pregnancy is proposed when a life worse than non-existence is indicated.
Conclusions:
- Parental duties in prenatal genetic testing are conditional on potential child welfare.
- The ethical framework supports testing and potential termination to prevent a life deemed worse than non-existence.
- This duty does not extend to conditions where the resulting life is considered preferable to non-existence.
Abstract:
This paper considers parental duties of beneficence and non-maleficence to use prenatal genetic testing for non-treatable conditions. It is proposed that this can be a duty only if the testing is essential to protect the interests of the child i.e. only if there is a risk of the child being born to a life worse than non-existence. It is argued here that non-existence can be rationally preferred to a severely impaired life. Uncontrollable pain and a lack of any opportunity to develop a continuous self are considered to be sufficient criteria for such preference. When parents are at risk of having a child whose life would be worse than non-existence, the parents have a duty to use prenatal testing and a duty to terminate an affected pregnancy. Further, such duty does not apply to any conditions where the resulting life can be considered better than non-existence.
Related Concept Videos
Genomic Imprinting and Inheritance
The expression of some genes depends on which parent passed the gene to the offspring, through a phenomenon known as...
Pedigree Analysis
Animal Mitochondrial Genetics
Sex-linked Disorders
Probability Laws
Inborn Errors of Metabolism

