Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Clarifying the abstracts of systematic literature reviews
1Department of Psychology, Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom. j.hartley@psy.keele.ac.uk
Background:
There is a small body of research on improving the clarity of abstracts in general that is relevant to improving the clarity of abstracts of systematic reviews.
Objectives:
To summarize this earlier research and indicate its implications for writing the abstracts of systematic reviews.
Method:
Literature review with commentary on three main features affecting the clarity of abstracts: their language, structure, and typographical presentation.
Conclusions:
The abstracts of systematic reviews should be easier to read than the abstracts of medical research articles, as they are targeted at a wider audience. The aims, methods, results, and conclusions of systematic reviews need to be presented in a consistent way to help search and retrieval. The typographic detailing of the abstracts (type-sizes, spacing, and weights) should be planned to help, rather than confuse, the reader.
Related Concept Videos
Levels of Organization
The Scientific Method
Proofreading
Blind Procedures
Ethics in Research
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...