Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The legal framework for effective competition.

R A Berenson, D A Hastings, W G Kopit

    The Baxter Health Policy Review
    |January 1, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    'Blueprint for the future' may lessen HMOs' impact. Interview by Frank Diamond.

    Managed care (Langhorne, Pa.)·2001
    Same author

    The need for demonstrations to test new ideas.

    Health affairs (Project Hope)·2000
    Same author

    The changing face of law and medicine in the new millennium. Foreword.

    American journal of law & medicine·2000
    Same author

    Patient rights meet managed care: understanding the underlying conflicts.

    Journal of health law·2000
    Same author

    Evaluation and management guidelines.

    The New England journal of medicine·1999
    Same author

    Bringing forth Medicare+Choice: HCFA's Robert A. Berenson. Interview by John K Iglehart.

    Health affairs (Project Hope)·1999
    Same journal

    Rationing health care: what it is, what it is not, and why we cannot avoid it.

    The Baxter health policy review·1996
    Same journal

    Managed care for people with disabilities: caring for those with the greatest need.

    The Baxter health policy review·1996
    Same journal

    Redefining private insurance in a changing market structure.

    The Baxter health policy review·1996
    Same journal

    The special health care needs of the elderly.

    The Baxter health policy review·1996
    Same journal

    The changing environment for technological innovation in health care.

    The Baxter health policy review·1996
    Same journal

    The role of quality measurement in a competitive marketplace.

    The Baxter health policy review·1996
    See all related articles

    The shift to market-based healthcare models creates legal challenges for integrated delivery systems. Antitrust laws are crucial for ensuring competition and preventing anticompetitive practices in these evolving systems.

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Law and Policy
    • Antitrust Law
    • Health Economics

    Background:

    • The traditional professional domination model in healthcare is being superseded by a market-based model driven by competition among managed care plans and integrated delivery systems.
    • This transition is largely influenced by the need to control spiraling healthcare costs.
    • Increased integration among providers, such as joint ventures and shared financial risk, can reduce certain legal risks by minimizing opportunities for collusive behavior.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the complex interplay of legal and regulatory risks faced by provider joint ventures and integrated delivery systems.
    • To examine how specific laws, including fraud and abuse, self-referral, private inurement, corporate practice of medicine, Medicare reimbursement, and antitrust enforcement, impact these integrated systems.
    • To address the policy inconsistency where collaboration is encouraged, yet existing regulations may deem such activities illegal.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of existing healthcare laws and regulations governing provider integration.
    • Review of antitrust enforcement policies, particularly the focus on 'market power' for integrated delivery systems.
    • Examination of the historical context of regulations developed during a fee-for-service era versus current market-based healthcare needs.

    Main Results:

    • Integrated delivery systems navigate a complex legal landscape with potential risks despite increased integration potentially reducing some legal exposure.
    • A fundamental inconsistency exists between the demand for provider collaboration and regulatory concerns that collaborative activities may trigger illegal actions.
    • Antitrust analysis for integrated delivery systems centers on market power; systems lacking market power generally face lower antitrust risk.

    Conclusions:

    • Vigorous antitrust enforcement is necessary to foster competition among integrated provider networks and managed care plans.
    • Legal frameworks need to adapt to support integrated service network models operating under financial risk.
    • Ensuring a permissive legal environment is essential for the successful development and operation of integrated healthcare delivery systems in a competitive market.