Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Commentary: reconstruing genetic research as research.

M T Lysaught1

  • 1University of Dayton, Ohio, USA.

The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics : a Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics
|November 7, 2000
PubMed
Summary

The Research and Analysis Center (RAC) faced disbandment due to conflating research with therapy. However, its resistance efforts and adoption of informed consent practices are highlighted.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genetic testing's "soft underbelly". Christian vision and bio-utopia.

Health progress (Saint Louis, Mo.)·2001
Same author

Stem cell research: licit or complicit? Is a medical breakthrough based on embryonic and fetal tissue compatible with Catholic teaching?

Health progress (Saint Louis, Mo.)·2000
Same author

Regulation of human gene therapy.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1995
Same author

From clinic to congregation: religious communities and genetic medicine.

Christian scholar's review·1994
Same author

Choosing palliative care: do religious beliefs make a difference?

Journal of palliative care·1994
Same author

Mifepristone (RU 486)--an abortifacient to prevent abortion?

The New England journal of medicine·1993

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Research Ethics
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • The Research and Analysis Center (RAC) has been criticized for conflating research with therapy.
  • Therapeutic criteria have been problematically reduced to compassion within the field.
  • Counter-cultural efforts within RAC aimed to resist this conflation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the factors contributing to the Research and Analysis Center's (RAC) disbandment.
  • To examine RAC's resistance to the conflation of research and therapy.
  • To assess RAC's implementation of informed consent recommendations.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of RAC's historical work and ethical frameworks.
  • Examination of documented counter-cultural initiatives within RAC.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchGenetics and ReproductionLegal ApproachNational Institutes of HealthRecombinant DNA Advisory Committee

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of RAC's evolving practices concerning informed consent.

    • Main Results:

    • RAC's resistance to conflating research and therapy paradoxically contributed to movements advocating for its disbandment.
    • RAC's work began to incorporate recommendations for informed consent.
    • The reduction of therapeutic criteria to compassion was a significant factor in the controversy.

    Conclusions:

    • The Research and Analysis Center's (RAC) efforts to maintain ethical boundaries were complex and led to its eventual dissolution.
    • RAC's evolution demonstrates a shift towards improved informed consent procedures in research.
    • Ethical considerations in research and therapy require clear distinctions and robust oversight.