Related Experiment Videos
Killing and allowing to die: another look
1St. Vincents Hospital, New York City, USA.
Summary
This study defends the distinction between killing and allowing to die. It uses contemporary philosophy of action and intention to show this difference is coherent.
Area of Science:
- Philosophy of Action
- Ethics
- Medical Ethics
Background:
- The distinction between killing and allowing to die is a central topic in ethical discourse.
- Contemporary philosophy of action and intention provides frameworks for analyzing human conduct.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an analytic defense for the coherence of the distinction between killing and allowing to die.
- To explore the philosophical underpinnings of actions and intentions in ethical decision-making.
Main Methods:
- Philosophical analysis of concepts related to action and intention.
- Examination of contemporary literature in the philosophy of action.
Main Results:
- The distinction between killing and allowing to die is shown to be coherent.
- The analysis supports the view that intentionality plays a crucial role in differentiating these acts.
Conclusions:
- The ethical significance of the distinction between killing and allowing to die is affirmed.
- Contemporary philosophy of action offers robust tools for understanding complex ethical dilemmas.