Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026
Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
Published on: May 9, 2014
On the need for massive additional shielding of a catheterization laboratory for the implementation of high dose rate
1Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale-New Haven Hospital, 20 York Street, New Haven, CT, USA
Abstract:
Purpose: There is a widespread belief in the cardiology and radiation oncology community that high dose rate 192Ir intravascular brachytherapy cannot be implemented without massive additional shielding of the conventional catheterization labs. The purpose of this work is to show that this is a myth, which is not based on sound radiation protection principles.Methods: Exposure rates in air were calculated for a variety of point and line sources of 192Ir. Exposures per treatment at different distances from the source were calculated for a typical intravascular brachytherapy treatment of a 15-Gy dose at a radial distance of 2 mm from the source and for source lengths in the range of 0 to 10 cm. Additionally, exposure rates outside the catheterization lab were calculated for various lead shielding thicknesses typical of conventional X-ray facilities. These rates were used along with the NCRP recommendations on radiation facility design to assess shielding requirements.Results: For a treatment dose of 15 Gy at 2 mm, the occupational exposure per treatment at 2 m in air without any tissue attenuation or shielding was 7.8 mR for a lesion length of 3.0 cm. This exposure/treatment is independent of the dose rate or the activity of the source. However, it increases as lesion length is increased, increasing from 5.4 to 24.9 mR as lesion length increased from 2 to 10 cm. Exposures in unrestricted areas outside the catheterization lab using the NCRP shielding rationale can be kept below 2 mR per treatment and using appropriate workload, use, and occupancy factors below 2 mR per week.Conclusions: The feasibility of implementing a high dose rate 192Ir intravascular brachytherapy program in a catheterization laboratory is totally independent of the dose rate or the activity of the source. If it is feasible to implement 192Ir brachytherapy in a conventional catheterization lab using low activity 192Ir seeds, then it is also feasible to do so with a high activity 192Ir afterloader.
