Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cytometric methods to analyze ionizing-radiation effects.

W D Wright1, I Lagroye, P Zhang

  • 1Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63108, USA.

Methods in Cell Biology
|November 9, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

<i>In vitro</i>differentiation of human cardiac fibroblasts into myofibroblasts: characterization using electrical impedance.

Biomedical physics & engineering express·2021
Same author

Effect of exposure to the edge signal on oxidative stress in brain cell models.

Radiation research·2011
Same author

In vitro and in vivo genotoxicity of radiofrequency fields.

Mutation research·2010
Same author

Renal cytotoxicity of cisplatin in cultured glomerular mesangial and proximal and distal tubular cells.

Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA·2010
Same author

A confirmation study of Russian and Ukrainian data on effects of 2450 MHz microwave exposure on immunological processes and teratology in rats.

Radiation research·2009
Same author

Evaluation of the potential genotoxic effects of rTMS on the rat brain and current density mapping.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2007
Same journal

Quantification of cell viability by automated analysis of live cell imaging.

Methods in cell biology·2026
Same journal

Flow cytometry evaluation of cytotoxicity exerted by effector immune cells against tumor cells.

Methods in cell biology·2026
Same journal

Time-lapse confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis of FOOD formation.

Methods in cell biology·2026
Same journal

Screening and identification of protein-protein interaction using proximity labeling.

Methods in cell biology·2026
Same journal

Quantitative high-content profiling of mitochondrial morphology with automated statistical analysis and integrated data visualization.

Methods in cell biology·2026
Same journal

Super-resolution imaging of cell death in Drosophila tissues via expansion and pan-expansion microscopy.

Methods in cell biology·2026
See all related articles

New cytometric assays detect radiation-induced DNA damage. The alkaline/neutral comet assays quantify genomic damage, while halo/halo-comet assays assess cellular radiosensitivity for predictive markers.

Area of Science:

  • Cellular biology
  • Radiation biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Assessing DNA damage is crucial for understanding cellular responses to radiation.
  • Existing methods may lack sensitivity for low-dose exposures or fail to capture radiosensitivity differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present four cytometric assays for evaluating radiation-induced DNA damage in individual cells.
  • To explore their potential for quantifying genomic damage and assessing intrinsic cellular radiosensitivity.

Main Methods:

  • Alkaline comet assay
  • Neutral comet assay
  • Halo assay
  • Halo-comet assay

Main Results:

  • Alkaline and neutral comet assays effectively detect DNA damage from low radiation doses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Halo and halo-comet assays reveal chromatin structure changes related to radiosensitivity.
  • These assays offer potential for quantifying damage in clinical and environmental contexts.

    • Conclusions:

    • Developed cytometric assays provide sensitive detection of DNA damage and radiosensitivity.
    • Further refinement could yield predictive markers for cellular responses to DNA damaging agents.
    • These methods advance the assessment of genomic damage and cellular radiosensitivity.