Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The feedback sanction.

P Croskerry1

  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. dghosp@crhb.ns.ca

Academic Emergency Medicine : Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
|November 10, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Survey to Determine Decision-Making Styles of Working Paramedics and Student Paramedics.

CJEM·2016
Same author

Better clinical decision making and reducing diagnostic error.

The journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh·2011
Same author

Emergency medicine: A practice prone to error?

CJEM·2007
Same author

Setting the educational agenda and curriculum for error prevention in emergency medicine.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·2000
Same author

The cognitive imperative: thinking about how we think.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·2000
Same author

Clinical decision making: an emergency medicine perspective.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·1999

Feedback is crucial for safe emergency department (ED) care and clinician performance. Obstacles like time pressure and communication failures hinder effective feedback, impacting patient safety and job satisfaction.

Area of Science:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Healthcare Systems Analysis
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Emergency departments (EDs) are complex systems reliant on feedback for optimal functioning.
  • Historical factors and operational characteristics impede effective feedback mechanisms in EDs.
  • Suboptimal feedback negatively impacts clinician performance, learning, and patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify barriers to effective feedback in the emergency department.
  • To emphasize the critical role of feedback in ED operations, education, and human factors.
  • To leverage current interest in medical error and patient safety to examine feedback's role.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of factors hindering feedback in EDs.
  • Literature review on feedback mechanisms in healthcare.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of existing research on medical error and patient safety culture.

    • Main Results:

    • Key barriers include time pressures, communication failures, and deficient reporting systems.
    • Inadequate feedback compromises safe care, learning, and job fulfillment for ED staff.
    • EDs require improved feedback processes for individual and team performance.

    Conclusions:

    • Effective feedback is essential for maintaining ED homeostasis and ensuring safe patient care.
    • Addressing identified barriers is critical for enhancing clinician performance and job satisfaction.
    • Further research into feedback mechanisms can improve ED function and patient safety outcomes.