Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The new peer review.

I S Kohane1, R B Altman

  • 1Children's Hospital Informatics Program, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, USA. isaac_kohane@harvard.edu

Proceedings. AMIA Symposium
|November 18, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The phenotypical implications of immune dysregulation in fragile X syndrome.

European journal of neurology·2020
Same author

Pharmacogenomics-Based Point-of-Care Clinical Decision Support Significantly Alters Drug Prescribing.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2017
Same author

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems for interpreting complex medical datasets.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2017
Same author

The Pharmacogenomics Research Network Translational Pharmacogenetics Program: Outcomes and Metrics of Pharmacogenetic Implementations Across Diverse Healthcare Systems.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2017
Same author

The International SSRI Pharmacogenomics Consortium (ISPC): a genome-wide association study of antidepressant treatment response.

Translational psychiatry·2016
Same author

Estimation of Maximum Recommended Therapeutic Dose Using Predicted Promiscuity and Potency.

Clinical and translational science·2016
Same journal

Progressive display of very high resolution images using wavelets.

Proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2002
Same journal

The Chronus II temporal database mediator.

Proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2002
Same journal

Gene expression levels in different stages of progression in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2002
Same journal

An assessment of the visibility of MeSH-indexed medical web catalogs through search engines.

Proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2002
Same journal

Filtering for medical news items using a machine learning approach.

Proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2002
Same journal

Enriching the structure of the UMLS semantic network.

Proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2002
See all related articles

The internet is changing scientific publishing, leading to a "publish first, review later" trend. New technologies can support a distributed peer review system for modern scientific communication.

Area of Science:

  • Bibliometrics
  • Scientific Communication
  • Information Science

Background:

  • The internet has revolutionized scientific publication, enabling widespread and uncontrolled dissemination of information.
  • The rise of online preprint repositories signifies a shift towards a 'publish first, review later' model in scientific research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the implications of the internet on traditional scientific publishing models.
  • To investigate the emerging "publish first, review later" trend in life sciences.
  • To identify and discuss technologies for implementing a new, distributed peer review process.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of internet's impact on publication dynamics.
  • Analysis of trends in online scientific repositories and preprint servers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conceptual discussion of technological solutions for distributed peer review.

    • Main Results:

    • The internet has diminished control over the release of web-based publications.
    • Preprint repositories highlight a growing trend towards immediate publication followed by peer review.
    • Existing technologies can be leveraged to create novel, distributed peer review systems.

    Conclusions:

    • The traditional peer review process requires adaptation in the digital age.
    • Distributed peer review models offer a viable solution to evolving publication landscapes.
    • Technological advancements can facilitate more robust and inclusive scientific evaluation.