Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Mt. Hood challenge: cross-testing two diabetes simulation models.

J B Brown1, A J Palmer, P Bisgaard

  • 1Center for Health Research, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227-1110, USA. jonathan.brown@kp.org

Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
|November 18, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Comparing two type 2 diabetes models, the IMIB model predicted higher mortality and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) rates than the Global Diabetes Model (GDM). Differences stemmed from model architecture and data sources, highlighting the need for cross-validation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using Defence Engagement (Health) to progress the Women Peace and Security agenda.

BMJ military health·2024
Same author

Important Considerations for ADHD 'Patient and Public' Involvement and Engagement in Research.

Medical research archives·2023
Same author

Harnessing the potential of data-driven strategies to optimise transfusion practice.

British journal of haematology·2023
Same author

Measurement is the foundation of research and theory on children's eating behaviours: Current issues and directions for progress.

Appetite·2023
Same author

Infants later diagnosed with autism have lower canonical babbling ratios in the first year of life.

Molecular autism·2022
Same author

Burden of osteoarthritis in India and its states, 1990-2019: findings from the Global Burden of disease study 2019.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2022

Area of Science:

  • Diabetes research
  • Computational modeling
  • Health economics

Background:

  • Type 2 diabetes management relies on predictive models.
  • Existing models (IMIB, GDM) have not been rigorously cross-validated.
  • Standardized patient data is crucial for model comparison.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare 20-year predictions of the IMIB and GDM simulation models for type 2 diabetes.
  • To identify key differences in outcomes such as survival, cardiovascular events, and complications.
  • To assess the feasibility of cross-validating dissimilar diabetes simulation models.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized standardized male patients (45 or 75 years old) with varying type 2 diabetes risk factors (HbA1c, SBP, lipids).
  • Compared 20-year cumulative predictions for survival, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, retinopathy, macro-albuminuria, and amputation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed differences based on model architecture (Markov vs. microsimulation) and cardiovascular event prediction bases.

    • Main Results:

    • Both models produced realistic results and responded appropriately to risk factor changes.
    • IMIB predicted significantly higher mortality and AMI rates but fewer strokes compared to GDM.
    • GDM predicted higher lifetime costs due to lower mortality and different costing methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Cross-validation of diabetes simulation models using standardized patients is feasible.
    • Significant discrepancies between IMIB and GDM predictions underscore the need for model validation.
    • Differences in model architecture and data sources explain observed outcome variations.