Related Experiment Videos
"Do you have a healthy smile?"
1Center for Health Policy and Ethics, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68132, USA.
Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy
|November 18, 2000
Summary
Most cosmetic procedures by dentists and surgeons are not medically indicated. These interventions aim to enhance appearance, not restore health, and thus may not be evaluated by standard medical ethics.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Cosmetic Surgery
- Dentistry
Background:
- Cosmetic interventions are increasingly common in dentistry and plastic surgery.
- The ethical and medical classification of these procedures remains debated.
- Marketing strategies for cosmetic procedures often face scrutiny from medical professionals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if cosmetic interventions qualify as medical interventions proper.
- To assess whether cosmetic procedures should be evaluated using established medical-ethical norms.
- To differentiate between interventions aimed at health restoration and those focused on aesthetic enhancement.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of medical intervention definitions.
- Application of medical-ethical principles (nonmaleficence, beneficence, justice) to cosmetic procedures.
- Examination of the objective and subjective goals of cosmetic interventions.
Main Results:
- Most cosmetic interventions do not meet objective standards for restoring or maintaining patient health.
- Cosmetic procedures primarily aim to enhance physical appearance based on subjective client perception.
- The classification of cosmetic interventions as 'medical practice proper' is questionable.
Conclusions:
- Cosmetic interventions generally do not qualify as medical interventions proper.
- Evaluating cosmetic procedures by strict medical-ethical standards may be inappropriate if they do not address health.
- A clear distinction is needed between health-restoring treatments and appearance-enhancing procedures.