Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Reducing normative bias in health technology assessment: interactive evaluation and casuistry
R P Reuzel1, G J van der Wilt, H A ten Have
1Department of Medical Technology Assessment, University of Nijmegen, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The Netherlands. r.reuzel@mie.kun.nl
Abstract:
Health technology assessment (HTA) is often biased in the sense that it neglects relevant perspectives on the technology in question. To incorporate different perspectives in HTA, we should pursue agreement about what are relevant, plausible, and feasible research questions; interactive technology assessment (iTA) might be suitable for this goal. In this way a kind of procedural ethics is established. Currently, ethics too often is focussed on the application of general principles, which leaves a lot of confusion as to what really is the matter in specific cases; in an iTA clashes of values should not be approached by use of such ethics. Instead, casuistry, as a tool used within the framework of iTA, should help to articulate and clarify what is the matter, as to make room for explication and consensus building.
Related Concept Videos
Blind Procedures
Ethics and Bioethics
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Halo Effect