Related Experiment Videos
Aims, options and outcomes in measuring maternal mortality in developing societies
Y Berhane1, T Andersson, S Wall
1Department of Community Health, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
|November 18, 2000
Summary
This study compared methods for measuring maternal mortality in Ethiopia. Direct observation, case-control, and sisterhood methods yielded similar maternal mortality ratio estimates, aiding safer motherhood initiatives.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Demography
Background:
- Accurate measurement of maternal mortality is crucial for evaluating interventions in developing countries.
- Safer motherhood initiatives require reliable data on maternal deaths.
- This study evaluates different maternal mortality measurement techniques within a single rural Ethiopian setting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of direct observation, case-control, and sisterhood methods for estimating maternal mortality.
- To assess the operational feasibility and outcome of different measurement approaches.
- To provide data for improving maternal mortality measurement in similar contexts.
Main Methods:
- Maternal mortality estimation using direct observation.
- Maternal mortality estimation using a case-control approach.
- Maternal mortality estimation using the sisterhood method in a rural Ethiopian community.
Main Results:
- Adjusted estimates for the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) ranged from 440 to 665 per 100,000 live births across the methods.
- The study provides a comparative analysis of the identified methods in a real-world setting.
- All tested methods produced comparable estimates, suggesting their utility.
Conclusions:
- The study highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each method regarding feasibility and results.
- The findings support the use of multiple methods for robust maternal mortality measurement.
- Comparative data are essential for refining strategies to reduce maternal mortality.