Related Experiment Videos
Optimal method to achieve consistently low defibrillation energy requirements
J Winter1, N Zimmermann, H Lidolt
1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
The American Journal of Cardiology
|November 21, 2000
Summary
Reducing defibrillation energy requirements for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) can decrease device size and increase longevity. Repositioning the endocardial lead coil in the right ventricle effectively lowers high defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) to below 15 J.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Reducing defibrillation energy requirements for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is crucial for device miniaturization and extended longevity.
- High defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) can necessitate larger devices or additional electrodes, impacting patient outcomes.
- The TRIAD lead system (RV- --> SVC+ + CAN+) is used in ICD implantation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively evaluate the efficacy of repositioning the distal endocardial lead coil to achieve confirmed defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) of ≤15 J in patients requiring ICD implantation.
- To determine if lead repositioning can reduce DFTs in patients with initial thresholds exceeding 15 J.
- To assess the impact of lead repositioning on the overall energy requirements for defibrillation.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 190 consecutive patients undergoing ICD implantation for ventricular fibrillation and/or recurrent ventricular tachycardia.
- Initial DFTs were measured with an endocardial dual-coil lead system. For patients with DFTs >15 J, the distal coil was repositioned towards the intraventricular septum.
- Ventricular fibrillation was induced, and successful defibrillation was confirmed at the lowest energy level (DFTplus).
Main Results:
- 177 out of 190 patients (93%) achieved successful defibrillation with ≤15 J using the initial lead position.
- In 13 patients (7%) with initial DFTs >15 J, repositioning the endocardial lead was necessary and successful in all cases, achieving ≤15 J.
- The mean DFTplus for all patients was 7.6 ± 3.7 J, with 87% achieving DFTplus ≤10 J. Repositioning resulted in a mean DFTplus of 11.0 ± 4.5 J in the repositioned group.
- No additional subcutaneous or epicardial electrodes were required for any patient.
Conclusions:
- Repositioning the endocardial lead coil in the right ventricle is a simple and effective method for reducing intraoperative high DFTs.
- This technique allows for the use of ICDs with a 20 J output in the vast majority of patients (87%), potentially reducing device size and increasing longevity.
- The study successfully avoided the need for additional electrodes, simplifying the implantation procedure and improving patient management.