Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prospective randomized trials on pacing mode: what have we learned?

R G Charles1

  • 1Cardiothoracic Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

The American Journal of Cardiology
|November 21, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Physiologic pacing may improve outcomes compared to single-chamber ventricular pacing, but more research is needed. Atrial-based pacing shows promise for quality of life and reducing atrial fibrillation in sinus node disease.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-term survival after permanent pacemaker implantation: analysis of predictors for increased mortality.

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology·2002
Same author

Extrinsic compression of the left atrium: an unusual complication of a type B aortic dissection.

International journal of cardiology·2001
Same author

Single chamber atrial pacing: an underused and cost-effective pacing modality in sinus node disease.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·1999
Same author

Systematic trial of pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation (STOP-AF).

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·1997
Same author

The impact of a dedicated "syncope and falls" clinic on pacing practice in northeastern England.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·1997
Same author

Trends in pacemaker mode prescription 1984-1994: a single centre study of 3710 patients.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·1996

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Observational studies suggest physiologic pacing improves outcomes over single-chamber ventricular pacing.
  • Methodologic flaws, including selection bias, limit the certainty of these findings.
  • Randomized, prospective studies are necessary to validate pacemaker mode selection benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with different pacemaker pacing modes.
  • To assess the impact of atrial-based pacing on quality of life and specific adverse events.
  • To determine the efficacy of physiologic pacing in patients with heart failure and sinus node disease.

Main Methods:

  • Review of retrospective studies and observational clinical data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of evidence from available studies on pacemaker mode prescription.
  • Consideration of ongoing large prospective trials for definitive evidence.

    • Main Results:

    • Physiologic pacing is linked to better clinical outcomes and reduced mortality versus single-chamber ventricular pacing in observational data.
    • Atrial-based pacing may enhance quality of life and decrease chronic atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic events in sinus node disease.
    • Current evidence does not support benefits of physiologic pacing for congestive heart failure or longevity.

    Conclusions:

    • While retrospective data suggest benefits, definitive conclusions on pacemaker mode selection require results from ongoing prospective trials.
    • Atrial-based pacing shows potential advantages for specific patient groups, warranting further investigation.
    • Current guidelines should not be altered until robust evidence from large-scale randomized trials is available.