Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Three arguments for scientific freedom].

K Bayertz1

  • 1Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität D-Münster.

ALTEX
|November 21, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This paper systematically examines three classic arguments for scientific freedom, revealing how each relies on different views of science and its social context. The justifications often fail to account for modern scientific research realities.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Individualization of diagnosis and therapy].

Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2004
Same author

Reflecting bioethics.

Biomedical ethics (Tubingen, Germany)·2002
Same author

Recombinant DNA technology: chances, risks, ethical considerations.

International archives of occupational and environmental health·2000
Same author

What's special about molecular genetic diagnostics?

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·1998
Same author

Biology as technology.

Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·1998
Same author

Ethical aspects of gene therapy and molecular genetic diagnostics.

Cytokines and molecular therapy·1996
Same journal

New approach methodologies as first tier in an integrated approach to testing and assessment for non-genotoxic carcinogens.

ALTEX·2026
Same journal

Assessing the FDA's Year One Progress Report on Reducing Animal Testing.

ALTEX·2026
Same journal

Europe's roadmap finally arrives: Long on rigor, short on a clock.

ALTEX·2026
Same journal

Towards advanced in vitro models of testicular steroidogenesis for endocrine disruption testing.

ALTEX·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of EndoSens: A reliable skin sensitization assessment model.

ALTEX·2026
Same journal

Serum-free in vitro assessment of receptor-mediated endocrine activity including Phase-1 metabolism.

ALTEX·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Sociology of Science

Context:

  • Scientific freedom is a foundational principle, often assumed rather than systematically justified.
  • Few scholarly attempts exist to provide a robust, evidence-based justification for scientific freedom.
  • The evolving nature of scientific research necessitates a re-evaluation of its underlying principles.

Purpose:

  • To systematically analyze and critique three "classic" arguments used to justify the principle of scientific freedom.
  • To explore the implicit assumptions about the nature of science embedded within these justifications.
  • To assess the applicability of these arguments in light of contemporary scientific practices and social realities.

Summary:

  • The analysis reveals that each classic argument for scientific freedom is predicated on a distinct conception of science, thereby advocating for a specific model of scientific inquiry.

Related Experiment Videos

  • These justifications often rest on presuppositions that are misaligned with the current social and institutional landscape of scientific research.
  • A critical examination highlights that traditional arguments for scientific freedom do not adequately incorporate the profound transformations science has undergone throughout its history.

    • Impact:

    • Provides a critical framework for understanding the philosophical and sociological underpinnings of scientific freedom.
    • Challenges the uncritical acceptance of traditional justifications for scientific freedom in contemporary contexts.
    • Informs ongoing debates about the governance, ethics, and future direction of scientific research and its societal role.